Sexual selection and population divergence III: Interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating signals

Peter A. Moran*, John Hunt, Christopher Mitchell, Michael G. Ritchie, Nathan W. Bailey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A major challenge for studying the role of sexual selection in divergence and speciation is understanding the relative influence of different sexually selected signals on those processes in both intra- and interspecific contexts. Different signals may be more or less susceptible to co-option for species identification depending on the balance of sexual and ecological selection acting upon them. To examine this, we tested three predictions to explain geographic variation in long- versus short-range sexual signals across a 3,500 + km transect of two related Australian field cricket species (Teleogryllus spp.): (a) selection for species recognition, (b) environmental adaptation and (c) stochastic divergence. We measured male calling song and male and female cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in offspring derived from wild populations, reared under common garden conditions. Song clearly differentiated the species, and no hybrids were observed suggesting that hybridization is rare or absent. Spatial variation in song was not predicted by geography, genetics or climatic factors in either species. In contrast, CHC divergence was strongly associated with an environmental gradient supporting the idea that the climatic environment selects more directly upon these chemical signals. In light of recently advocated models of diversification via ecological selection on secondary sexual traits, the different environmental associations we found for song and CHCs suggest that the impact of ecological selection on population divergence, and how that influences speciation, might be different for acoustic versus chemical signals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)990-1005
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

We owe a debt of gratitude to numerous individuals who assisted with cricket sampling, rearing and maintenance, particularly S. Blanksby, D. Forbes, A. Grant, M. Higgie, K. Holmes, T. Ly, M. McGunnigle, R. Ollerynshaw, S. Vardy and the Westman family. M. Burdon assisted with method development for GC-MS analysis of CHCs and in addition to S. Pascoal gave helpful advice about CHC data collection and analysis. Funding support was provided by NERC grants to N.W.B. (NE/G014906/1, NE/L011255/1), NERC (NE/G00949X/1) and ARC grants to J.H. (DP180101708) and an Orthopterists' Society grant to P.A.M. We owe a debt of gratitude to numerous individuals who assisted with cricket sampling, rearing and maintenance, particularly S. Blanksby, D. Forbes, A. Grant, M. Higgie, K. Holmes, T. Ly, M. McGunnigle, R. Ollerynshaw, S. Vardy and the Westman family. M. Burdon assisted with method development for GC‐MS analysis of CHCs and in addition to S. Pascoal gave helpful advice about CHC data collection and analysis. Funding support was provided by NERC grants to N.W.B. (NE/G014906/1, NE/L011255/1), NERC (NE/G00949X/1) and ARC grants to J.H. (DP180101708) and an Orthopterists' Society grant to P.A.M.

FundersFunder number
Westman family
Appalachian Regional Commission
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/G00949X/1, NE/G014906/1, NE/L011255/1
National Eye Research Centre
Australian Research CouncilDP180101708

    Keywords

    • acoustic signalling
    • character displacement
    • chemical signalling
    • ecological speciation
    • environmental selection
    • multi-modal signalling
    • sexual selection
    • Teleogryllus

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual selection and population divergence III: Interspecific and intraspecific variation in mating signals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this