Abstract
Product harm information spreading in the marketplace may have profound consequences for companies, public policy makers and consumer well-being. However, limited research is available on what makes consumers share such information with others. This paper examines how self-relevance and self-construal affect the sharing of product harm information and the underlying processes that shape sharing. Five experiments demonstrate that under independent self-construal, highly self-relevant product harm information is less likely to be shared. The reluctance to share highly self-relevant information is attenuated under interdependent self-construal. The differential effects of self-construal are related to self-serving processes and motivations for sharing product harm information with others. The results apply to the sharing of negative information, but not positive information. Companies may use these findings to manage the diffusion of product harm information.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 319-335 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | International Journal of Research in Marketing |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 15 Jun 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2018 |
Funding
The authors thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and valuable feedback. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM) and Vrije University Amsterdam. Appendix A
Keywords
- Health information
- Product harm
- Self-construal
- Self-relevance
- Word-of-mouth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sharing product harm information: The effects of self-construal and self-relevance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver