Abstract
Most everyday tasks require shifting the focus of attention between sensory signals in the external environment and internal contents in working memory. To date, shifts of attention have been investigated within each domain, but shifts between the external and internal domain remain poorly understood. We developed a combined perception and working-memory task to investigate and compare the consequences of shifting spatial attention within and between domains in the service of a common orientation-reproduction task. Participants were sequentially cued to attend to items either in working memory or to an upcoming sensory stimulation. Stay trials provided a baseline condition, while shift trials required participants to shift their attention to another item within the same or different domain. Validating our experimental approach, we found evidence that participants shifted attention effectively in either domain (Experiment 1). In addition, we observed greater costs when transitioning attention between as compared to within domains (Experiments 1, 2). Strikingly, these costs persisted even when participants were given more time to complete the attentional shift (Experiment 2). Biases in fixational gaze behaviour tracked attentional orienting in both domains, but revealed no latency or magnitude difference for within- versus between-domain shifts (Experiment 1). Collectively, the results from Experiments 1 and 2 suggest that shifting between attentional domains might be regulated by a unique control function. Our results break new ground for exploring the ubiquitous act of shifting attention between perception and working memory to guide adaptive behaviour in everyday cognition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 105731 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Cognition |
Volume | 245 |
Early online date | 25 Jan 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors
Funding
The authors would like to thank Gordon Dodwell for his thoughtful comments on this manuscript and Levi Kumle for their assistance with the power analysis. This research was supported by the Experimental Psychology Society Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to S.E.P.B., an ERC Starting Grant from the European Research Council (MEMTICIPATION, 850636 ) and a NWO Vidi Grant from the Dutch Research Council ( 14721 ) awarded to F.v.E., a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award ( 104571/Z/14/Z ) and a James S. McDonnell Foundation Understanding Human Cognition Collaborative Award ( 220020448 ) awarded to A.C.N., and by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre . The Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from the Wellcome Trust ( 203139/Z/16/Z ). For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC-BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
MEMTICIPATION | 850636 |
James S. McDonnell Foundation | 220020448 |
Wellcome Trust | 104571/Z/14/Z |
European Research Council | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 14721 |
NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre | 203139/Z/16/Z |
Keywords
- External attention
- Fixational gaze behaviour
- Internal attention
- Shifting attention
- Vision