Shop-floor scheduling as a competitive advantage: A study on the relevance of cyber-physical systems in different manufacturing contexts

Rodrigo Romero-Silva*, Gabriel Hernández-López

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse the relevance of cyber-physical systems (CPS) in different manufacturing contexts and to study whether CPS could provide companies with competitive advantage by carrying out a better scheduling task. This paper is developed under the umbrella of contingency theory which states that certain technologies and practices are not universally applicable or relevant in every context; thus, only certain companies will benefit from using particular technologies or practices. The conclusion of this paper, developed through deductive reasoning and supported by preliminary simulation experiments and statistical tests, is that factories with an uncertain and demanding market environment as well as a complex production process could benefit the most from implementing a CPS at shop-floor level since a cyber-physical shop-floor will provide all the capabilities needed to carry out the complex scheduling task associated with this type of context. On the other hand, an increase in scheduling performance due to a CPS implementation in factories with simple production flows and stable demand could not be substantial enough to overcome the high cost of installing a fully operational CPS.

Original languageEnglish
Article number107555
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume224
Early online date9 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Contingency theory
  • Cyber-physical systems
  • Dynamic scheduling
  • Industry 4.0
  • Product-process
  • Smart manufacturing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shop-floor scheduling as a competitive advantage: A study on the relevance of cyber-physical systems in different manufacturing contexts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this