TY - JOUR
T1 - Silorane, ormocer, methacrylate and compomer long-term staining susceptibility using ΔE and ΔE00 colour-difference formulas
AU - Gregor, L.
AU - Krejci, I.
AU - Di Bella, E.
AU - Feilzer, A.J.
AU - Ardu, S.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the staining susceptibility of a silorane (Filtek Silorane), an ormocer (Ceram X Duo), a methacrylate (Tetric EvoCeram) and a compomer (Dyract) exposed on the long term to various staining agents by using ΔE and ΔE00 colour-difference formulas. Thirty-six disc-shaped specimens were made of each of the four chemically different materials, randomly divided in six groups (n = 6) and immersed in five staining solutions (red wine, juice, coke, tea and coffee) or stored dry (control) in an incubator at 37 °C for 99 days. Spectrophotometric measurements by means of a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade Handy Dental, MHT) were repeated over a white (L* = 92.6, a* = −1.2, b* = 2.9) and black (L* = 1.6, a* = 1.2, b* = −1.0) background made of plasticized paper, in order to determine the colour changes according to ΔE, ΔE00 and translucency formulas. Statistical analysis was performed by means of factorial Anova, Fisher’s LSD test (post hoc) and a Spearman rank correlation between ΔE and ΔE00. When analysed over a white background, mean ΔE00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 0.8 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 20.9 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). When analysed over a black background, mean ΔE00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 1.0 (Ceram X Duo and Tetric/air) to 25.2 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). Differences in translucency varied from 0.3 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 21.1 (Ceram X Duo/juice). The correlation between ΔE and ΔE00 over a white background was 0.9928, while over a black background, it was 0.9886.
AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the staining susceptibility of a silorane (Filtek Silorane), an ormocer (Ceram X Duo), a methacrylate (Tetric EvoCeram) and a compomer (Dyract) exposed on the long term to various staining agents by using ΔE and ΔE00 colour-difference formulas. Thirty-six disc-shaped specimens were made of each of the four chemically different materials, randomly divided in six groups (n = 6) and immersed in five staining solutions (red wine, juice, coke, tea and coffee) or stored dry (control) in an incubator at 37 °C for 99 days. Spectrophotometric measurements by means of a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade Handy Dental, MHT) were repeated over a white (L* = 92.6, a* = −1.2, b* = 2.9) and black (L* = 1.6, a* = 1.2, b* = −1.0) background made of plasticized paper, in order to determine the colour changes according to ΔE, ΔE00 and translucency formulas. Statistical analysis was performed by means of factorial Anova, Fisher’s LSD test (post hoc) and a Spearman rank correlation between ΔE and ΔE00. When analysed over a white background, mean ΔE00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 0.8 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 20.9 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). When analysed over a black background, mean ΔE00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 1.0 (Ceram X Duo and Tetric/air) to 25.2 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). Differences in translucency varied from 0.3 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 21.1 (Ceram X Duo/juice). The correlation between ΔE and ΔE00 over a white background was 0.9928, while over a black background, it was 0.9886.
U2 - 10.1007/s10266-015-0212-7
DO - 10.1007/s10266-015-0212-7
M3 - Article
SN - 1618-1247
VL - 104
SP - 305
EP - 309
JO - Odontology
JF - Odontology
IS - 3
ER -