Simulating carbon accumulation and loss in the central Congo peatlands

Dylan M. Young*, Andy J. Baird, Paul J. Morris, Greta C. Dargie, Y. Emmanuel Mampouya Wenina, Mackline Mbemba, Arnoud Boom, Peter Cook, Richard Betts, Eleanor Burke, Yannick E. Bocko, Sarah Chadburn, Dafydd E. Crabtree, Bart Crezee, Corneille E.N. Ewango, Yannick Garcin, Selena Georgiou, Nicholas T. Girkin, Pauline Gulliver, Donna HawthorneSuspense A. Ifo, Ian T. Lawson, Susan E. Page, A. Jonay Jovani-Sancho, Enno Schefuß, Matteo Sciumbata, Sofie Sjögersten, Simon L. Lewis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Peatlands of the central Congo Basin have accumulated carbon over millennia. They currently store some 29 billion tonnes of carbon in peat. However, our understanding of the controls on peat carbon accumulation and loss and the vulnerability of this stored carbon to climate change is in its infancy. Here we present a new model of tropical peatland development, DigiBog_Congo, that we use to simulate peat carbon accumulation and loss in a rain-fed interfluvial peatland that began forming ~20,000 calendar years Before Present (cal. yr BP, where ‘present’ is 1950 CE). Overall, the simulated age-depth curve is in good agreement with palaeoenvironmental reconstructions derived from a peat core at the same location as our model simulation. We find two key controls on long-term peat accumulation: water at the peat surface (surface wetness) and the very slow anoxic decay of recalcitrant material. Our main simulation shows that between the Late Glacial and early Holocene there were several multidecadal periods where net peat and carbon gain alternated with net loss. Later, a climatic dry phase beginning ~5200 cal. yr BP caused the peatland to become a long-term carbon source from ~3975 to 900 cal. yr BP. Peat as old as ~7000 cal. yr BP was decomposed before the peatland's surface became wetter again, suggesting that changes in rainfall alone were sufficient to cause a catastrophic loss of peat carbon lasting thousands of years. During this time, 6.4 m of the column of peat was lost, resulting in 57% of the simulated carbon stock being released. Our study provides an approach to understanding the future impact of climate change and potential land-use change on this vulnerable store of carbon.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6812-6827
Number of pages16
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume29
Issue number23
Early online date10 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was funded by CongoPeat—a NERC large grant (NE/R016860/1) to S.L.L., I.T.L., S.E.P., A.B., A.J.B., P.J.M., P.G. and S.S. Eleanor Burke was supported by the Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Sarah Chadburn was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council independent research fellowship (grant no. NE/R015791/1). We thank George Biddulph, Lera Miles, Ed Mitchard, the wider CongoPeat network and Richard Rigby for discussions.

Funding Information:
This work was funded by CongoPeat—a NERC large grant (NE/R016860/1) to S.L.L., I.T.L., S.E.P., A.B., A.J.B., P.J.M., P.G. and S.S. Eleanor Burke was supported by the Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Sarah Chadburn was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council independent research fellowship (grant no. NE/R015791/1). We thank George Biddulph, Lera Miles, Ed Mitchard, the wider CongoPeat network and Richard Rigby for discussions.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

This work was funded by CongoPeat—a NERC large grant (NE/R016860/1) to S.L.L., I.T.L., S.E.P., A.B., A.J.B., P.J.M., P.G. and S.S. Eleanor Burke was supported by the Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Sarah Chadburn was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council independent research fellowship (grant no. NE/R015791/1). We thank George Biddulph, Lera Miles, Ed Mitchard, the wider CongoPeat network and Richard Rigby for discussions. This work was funded by CongoPeat—a NERC large grant (NE/R016860/1) to S.L.L., I.T.L., S.E.P., A.B., A.J.B., P.J.M., P.G. and S.S. Eleanor Burke was supported by the Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Sarah Chadburn was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council independent research fellowship (grant no. NE/R015791/1). We thank George Biddulph, Lera Miles, Ed Mitchard, the wider CongoPeat network and Richard Rigby for discussions.

FundersFunder number
CongoPeat
George Biddulph
Joint UK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate ProgrammeGA01101
Lera Miles
Natural Environment Research CouncilNE/R016860/1, NE/R015791/1

    Keywords

    • carbon accumulation
    • Congo Basin peatlands
    • palaeoenvironmental reconstruction
    • simulation, model
    • tropical peat

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Simulating carbon accumulation and loss in the central Congo peatlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this