Abstract
The authors investigate whether the overpricing of out-of-the money single stock calls can be explained by Tversky and Kahneman's [1992] cumulative prospect theory (CPT). They hypothesize that these options are expensive because investors overweight small probability events and overpay for positively skewed securities (i.e., lottery tickets). The authors find that overweighting of small probabilities embedded in the CPT explains the richness of out-of-the money single stock calls better than other utility functions. Nevertheless, overweighting of small probabilities events is less pronounced than suggested by the CPT, is strongly time varying, and most frequent in options of short maturity. The authors find that fluctuations in overweighting of small probabilities are largely explained by the sentiment factor.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 385-407 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral Finance |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 22 Jan 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Funding
The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee at Journal of Behavioral Finance for their useful comments and suggestions. The authors thank seminar participants at the IFABS 2016 Barcelona Conference, VU University Amsterdam, APG Asset Management Quant Roundtable, at the 2016 Research in Behavioral Finance Conference in Amsterdam and at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for their helpful comments. The authors thank APG Asset Management for financial support and for making available part of the data.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Alberta Pulse Growers Commission | |
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
Keywords
- Call options
- Cumulative prospect theory
- Investor sentiment
- Risk-neutral densities