Abstract
Inoculation theory was introduced 60 years ago, after McGuire and Papageorgis (1961) published their first study on how resistance to persuasion can be induced. They demonstrated that people who are pre-exposed to weakened arguments against an attitude or position they currently hold (i.e., inoculated) are less affected by a subsequent strong counter-Attitudinal message than people who are pre-exposed to arguments consistent with their attitude (i.e., supportive defense treatment) or to no arguments. Although these results significantly impacted both science and practice on a general level, rigid tests of the key theoretical propositions are lacking. We conducted a highly powered replication study (N = 679) and found that an inoculation treatment is more effective in increasing resistance toward persuasion compared to a supportive defense treatment and a no-Treatment control condition. Our results were mostly consistent with McGuire and Papageorgis's original work.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 69-78 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Media Psychology |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 13 Sept 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Hogrefe Publishing.
Funding
This work is funded by a replication grant from the Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. |
Keywords
- Inoculation theory
- Persuasion
- Replication
- Resistance