Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter?

Hardy A. van de Ven, Jac J L van der Klink, Céline Vetter, Till Roenneberg, Marijke Gordijn, Wendy Koolhaas, Michiel P. de Looze, Sandra Brouwer, Ute Bültmann

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N = 261 industrial shift workers (96.6% male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.31–41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.45–11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results. Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)310-324
Number of pages15
JournalErgonomics
Volume59
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

shift worker
sleep
Sleep
Recovery
shift work
Appointments and Schedules
Needs Assessment
work research
health behavior
Research
cross-sectional study
Individuality
complaint
scheduling
Logistics
Life Style
Cross-Sectional Studies
Aging of materials
Logistic Models
logistics

Keywords

  • circadian rhythm
  • Munich Chronotype Questionnaire
  • shift work
  • work schedule tolerance

Cite this

van de Ven, H. A., van der Klink, J. J. L., Vetter, C., Roenneberg, T., Gordijn, M., Koolhaas, W., ... Bültmann, U. (2016). Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter? Ergonomics, 59(2), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426
van de Ven, Hardy A. ; van der Klink, Jac J L ; Vetter, Céline ; Roenneberg, Till ; Gordijn, Marijke ; Koolhaas, Wendy ; de Looze, Michiel P. ; Brouwer, Sandra ; Bültmann, Ute. / Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter?. In: Ergonomics. 2016 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 310-324.
@article{7502c2edc41b4d8787d7c2e6adc26079,
title = "Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers:: do chronotype and age matter?",
abstract = "This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N = 261 industrial shift workers (96.6{\%} male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95{\%} CI 3.31–41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95{\%} CI 4.45–11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results. Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.",
keywords = "circadian rhythm, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, shift work, work schedule tolerance",
author = "{van de Ven}, {Hardy A.} and {van der Klink}, {Jac J L} and C{\'e}line Vetter and Till Roenneberg and Marijke Gordijn and Wendy Koolhaas and {de Looze}, {Michiel P.} and Sandra Brouwer and Ute B{\"u}ltmann",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "310--324",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

van de Ven, HA, van der Klink, JJL, Vetter, C, Roenneberg, T, Gordijn, M, Koolhaas, W, de Looze, MP, Brouwer, S & Bültmann, U 2016, 'Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter?' Ergonomics, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 310-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426

Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter? / van de Ven, Hardy A.; van der Klink, Jac J L; Vetter, Céline; Roenneberg, Till; Gordijn, Marijke; Koolhaas, Wendy; de Looze, Michiel P.; Brouwer, Sandra; Bültmann, Ute.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 310-324.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers:

T2 - do chronotype and age matter?

AU - van de Ven, Hardy A.

AU - van der Klink, Jac J L

AU - Vetter, Céline

AU - Roenneberg, Till

AU - Gordijn, Marijke

AU - Koolhaas, Wendy

AU - de Looze, Michiel P.

AU - Brouwer, Sandra

AU - Bültmann, Ute

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N = 261 industrial shift workers (96.6% male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.31–41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.45–11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results. Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.

AB - This study examined associations of chronotype and age with shift-specific assessments of main sleep duration, sleep quality and need for recovery in a cross-sectional study among N = 261 industrial shift workers (96.6% male). Logistic regression analyses were used, adjusted for gender, lifestyle, health, nap behaviour, season of assessment and shift schedule. Shift workers with latest versus earliest chronotype reported a shorter sleep duration (OR 11.68, 95% CI 3.31–41.17) and more awakenings complaints (OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.45–11.92) during morning shift periods. No associations were found between chronotype, sleep and need for recovery during evening and night shift periods. For age, no associations were found with any of the shift-specific outcome measures. The results stress the importance of including the concept of chronotype in shift work research and scheduling beyond the concept of age. Longitudinal research using shift-specific assessments of sleep and need for recovery are needed to confirm these results. Practitioner Summary: Chronotype seems to better explain individual differences in sleep than age. In view of ageing societies, it might therefore be worthwhile to further examine the application of chronotype for individualised shift work schedules to facilitate healthy and sustainable employment.

KW - circadian rhythm

KW - Munich Chronotype Questionnaire

KW - shift work

KW - work schedule tolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959870722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959870722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426

DO - 10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 310

EP - 324

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 2

ER -

van de Ven HA, van der Klink JJL, Vetter C, Roenneberg T, Gordijn M, Koolhaas W et al. Sleep and need for recovery in shift workers: do chronotype and age matter? Ergonomics. 2016 Feb 1;59(2):310-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1058426