Abstract
The goal of compositional generalization benchmarks is to evaluate how well models generalize to new complex linguistic expressions. Existing benchmarks often focus on lexical generalization, the interpretation of novel lexical items in syntactic structures familiar from training. Structural generalization tasks, where a model needs to interpret syntactic structures that are themselves unfamiliar from training, are often underrepresented, resulting in overly optimistic perceptions of how well models can generalize. We introduce SLOG, a semantic parsing dataset that extends COGS (Kim and Linzen, 2020) with 17 structural generalization cases. In our experiments, the generalization accuracy of Transformer models, including pretrained ones, only reaches 40.6%, while a structure-aware parser only achieves 70.8%. These results are far from the near-perfect accuracy existing models achieve on COGS, demonstrating the role of SLOG in foregrounding the large discrepancy between models' lexical and structural generalization capacities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing |
Editors | Houda Bouamor, Juan Pino, Kalika Bali |
Place of Publication | Singapore |
Publisher | Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) |
Pages | 3213-3232 |
Number of pages | 20 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9798891760608 |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Event | 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2023 - Hybrid, Singapore, Singapore Duration: 6 Dec 2023 → 10 Dec 2023 |
Conference
Conference | 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2023 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Singapore |
City | Hybrid, Singapore |
Period | 6/12/23 → 10/12/23 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:©2023 Association for Computational Linguistics.
Funding
We thank Zhengxuan Wu, Christopher Manning, Christopher Potts and all members of the NYU Computation and Psycholinguistics Lab for helpful discussion. This work was supported in part through the NYU IT HPC resources, services, and staff expertise, and was funded by Labex EFL ANR-10-LABX-0083, the laboratory LLF of Université Paris Cité, the DFG through project KO 2916/2-2, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grants No. BCS-204122, BCS-2114505 and IIS-2239862.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Science Foundation | IIS-2239862, BCS-204122, BCS-2114505 |
New York University | |
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft | KO 2916/2-2 |
Labex | EFL ANR-10-LABX-0083 |
Université de Paris |