Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment

K.I. Van der Zee, Bram Buunk, Robbert Sanderman, Gerrit Botke, Fons Van den Bergh

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the present study scales were developed as indicators of four social comparison processes of respectively identification with others who are either doing better or worse and contrasting one's situation against the situation of either upward or downward comparison others. In a sample of 112 cancer patients, support was obtained for the validity of these scales. First, the internal consistency and stability of the scales were high. Interestingly, higher order factor analyses showed two basic factors labeled 'positive interpretation' (encompassing upward identification and downward contrast) versus 'negative interpretation' (encompassing upward contrast and downward identification). In addition, it was shown that the tendency to identify oneselves with others who are doing better and to contrast oneselves against others who are doing worse were moderately but significantly associated with a basic tendency to engage in confrontive coping styles, such as reinterpretation/growth, social support and active coping. The theoretical significance as well as the therapeutic implications of the findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-34
Number of pages18
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Social Support
Statistical Factor Analysis
Growth
Neoplasms
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cancer treatment
  • Coping
  • Social Comparison

Cite this

Van der Zee, K.I. ; Buunk, Bram ; Sanderman, Robbert ; Botke, Gerrit ; Van den Bergh, Fons. / Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. In: Personality and Individual Differences. 2000 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 17-34.
@article{64c507107b97499b988e227b22959470,
title = "Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment",
abstract = "In the present study scales were developed as indicators of four social comparison processes of respectively identification with others who are either doing better or worse and contrasting one's situation against the situation of either upward or downward comparison others. In a sample of 112 cancer patients, support was obtained for the validity of these scales. First, the internal consistency and stability of the scales were high. Interestingly, higher order factor analyses showed two basic factors labeled 'positive interpretation' (encompassing upward identification and downward contrast) versus 'negative interpretation' (encompassing upward contrast and downward identification). In addition, it was shown that the tendency to identify oneselves with others who are doing better and to contrast oneselves against others who are doing worse were moderately but significantly associated with a basic tendency to engage in confrontive coping styles, such as reinterpretation/growth, social support and active coping. The theoretical significance as well as the therapeutic implications of the findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Cancer treatment, Coping, Social Comparison",
author = "{Van der Zee}, K.I. and Bram Buunk and Robbert Sanderman and Gerrit Botke and {Van den Bergh}, Fons",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00045-8",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "17--34",
journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",
issn = "0191-8869",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment. / Van der Zee, K.I.; Buunk, Bram; Sanderman, Robbert; Botke, Gerrit; Van den Bergh, Fons.

In: Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 17-34.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment

AU - Van der Zee, K.I.

AU - Buunk, Bram

AU - Sanderman, Robbert

AU - Botke, Gerrit

AU - Van den Bergh, Fons

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - In the present study scales were developed as indicators of four social comparison processes of respectively identification with others who are either doing better or worse and contrasting one's situation against the situation of either upward or downward comparison others. In a sample of 112 cancer patients, support was obtained for the validity of these scales. First, the internal consistency and stability of the scales were high. Interestingly, higher order factor analyses showed two basic factors labeled 'positive interpretation' (encompassing upward identification and downward contrast) versus 'negative interpretation' (encompassing upward contrast and downward identification). In addition, it was shown that the tendency to identify oneselves with others who are doing better and to contrast oneselves against others who are doing worse were moderately but significantly associated with a basic tendency to engage in confrontive coping styles, such as reinterpretation/growth, social support and active coping. The theoretical significance as well as the therapeutic implications of the findings are discussed.

AB - In the present study scales were developed as indicators of four social comparison processes of respectively identification with others who are either doing better or worse and contrasting one's situation against the situation of either upward or downward comparison others. In a sample of 112 cancer patients, support was obtained for the validity of these scales. First, the internal consistency and stability of the scales were high. Interestingly, higher order factor analyses showed two basic factors labeled 'positive interpretation' (encompassing upward identification and downward contrast) versus 'negative interpretation' (encompassing upward contrast and downward identification). In addition, it was shown that the tendency to identify oneselves with others who are doing better and to contrast oneselves against others who are doing worse were moderately but significantly associated with a basic tendency to engage in confrontive coping styles, such as reinterpretation/growth, social support and active coping. The theoretical significance as well as the therapeutic implications of the findings are discussed.

KW - Cancer treatment

KW - Coping

KW - Social Comparison

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033633398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033633398&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00045-8

DO - 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00045-8

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 17

EP - 34

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

SN - 0191-8869

IS - 1

ER -