TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Media's Impact on the Consumer Mindset
T2 - When to Use Which Sentiment Extraction Tool?
AU - Kübler, Raoul V.
AU - Colicev, Anatoli
AU - Pauwels, Koen H.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - User-generated content provides many opportunities for managers and researchers, but insights are hindered by a lack of consensus on how to extract brand-relevant valence and volume. Marketing studies use different sentiment extraction tools (SETs) based on social media volume, top-down language dictionaries and bottom-up machine learning approaches. This paper compares the explanatory and forecasting power of these methods over several years for daily customer mindset metrics obtained from survey data. For 48 brands in diverse industries, vector autoregressive models show that volume metrics explain the most for brand awareness and purchase intent, while bottom-up SETs excel at explaining brand impression, satisfaction and recommendation. Systematic differences yield contingent advice: the most nuanced version of bottom-up SETs (SVM with Neutral) performs best for the search goods for all consumer mind-set metrics but Purchase Intent for which Volume metrics work best. For experienced goods, Volume outperforms SVM with neutral. As processing time and costs increase when moving from volume to top-down to bottom-up sentiment extraction tools, these conditional findings can help managers decide when more detailed analytics are worth the investment.
AB - User-generated content provides many opportunities for managers and researchers, but insights are hindered by a lack of consensus on how to extract brand-relevant valence and volume. Marketing studies use different sentiment extraction tools (SETs) based on social media volume, top-down language dictionaries and bottom-up machine learning approaches. This paper compares the explanatory and forecasting power of these methods over several years for daily customer mindset metrics obtained from survey data. For 48 brands in diverse industries, vector autoregressive models show that volume metrics explain the most for brand awareness and purchase intent, while bottom-up SETs excel at explaining brand impression, satisfaction and recommendation. Systematic differences yield contingent advice: the most nuanced version of bottom-up SETs (SVM with Neutral) performs best for the search goods for all consumer mind-set metrics but Purchase Intent for which Volume metrics work best. For experienced goods, Volume outperforms SVM with neutral. As processing time and costs increase when moving from volume to top-down to bottom-up sentiment extraction tools, these conditional findings can help managers decide when more detailed analytics are worth the investment.
KW - Brand strength
KW - Consumer attitudes
KW - Language dictionary
KW - LIWC
KW - Maching learning
KW - Sentiment extraction
KW - Support vector machine
KW - User generated content
KW - Valence
KW - Volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075906856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075906856&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.intmar.2019.08.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075906856
SN - 1094-9968
VL - 50
SP - 136
EP - 155
JO - Journal of Interactive Marketing
JF - Journal of Interactive Marketing
ER -