Social motives in integrative negotiation: The mediating influence of procedural fairness

Bianca Beersma*, Carsten K W De Dreu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticle

Abstract

Although a large body of research has examined the influence of social motives on integrative negotiation, little is known about how social motives affect procedural fairness judgments in negotiation. In two experiments concerned with small group negotiation, we manipulated group members' social motives (pro-social vs. egoistic), and measured joint negotiation outcomes and procedural fairness. Experiment 1 showed that, compared to group members with an egoistic motivation, those with a pro-social motive experienced more procedural fairness, which was partly responsible for the higher joint outcomes they obtained. In Experiment 2, we manipulated social motives and decision rule. Results showed that pro-social groups experienced more procedural fairness than egoistic groups when a majority rule was applied, but not when a unanimity rule was applied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-239
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2003

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Group negotiation
  • Procedural fairness
  • Social motives

Cite this