Abstract
In this paper we study the decidability of reachability, normalisation, and neededness in n-shallow and n-growing TRSs. In an n-growing TRS, a variable that occurs both on the left- and right-hand side of a rewrite rule must be at depth n on the left-hand side and at depth greater than n on the right-hand side. In an n-shallow TRS, a variable that occurs both on the left- and right-hand side of a rewrite rule must be at depth n on both sides. The n-growing and n-shallow TRSs are generalisations of the growing and shallow TRSs as introduced by Jacquemard and Comon. For both shallow and growing TRSs reachability, normalisation, and (in the orthogonal case) neededness are decidable. However, as we show, these results do not generalise to n-growing and n-shallow TRSs. Consequently, no algorithm exists that performs a needed reduction strategy in n-growing or n-shallow TRSs. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-63 |
| Journal | Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science |
| Volume | 124 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Bibliographical note
DBLP:journals/entcs/KetemaKO05Proceedings title: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Reduction Strategies in Rewriting and Programming (WRS 2004)
Publisher: Elsevier
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Some Undecidable Approximations of TRSs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver