Spatial analysis of new testament textual emendations utilizing confusion distances

Vincent Van Altena, Jan Krans, Henk Bakker, Balász Dukai, Jantien Stoter

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-65
Number of pages22
JournalOpen Theology
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

New Testament
Confusion
Emendation
Spatial Analysis
Letters
Multidimensional Scaling
Textual Criticism
Levenshtein Distance
Manuscripts
Visualization

Keywords

  • conjectural criticism
  • distant metrics
  • spatial analysis
  • spatialization
  • textual criticism

Cite this

@article{f5814a41a49f42338601cf906c5fa70c,
title = "Spatial analysis of new testament textual emendations utilizing confusion distances",
abstract = "Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.",
keywords = "conjectural criticism, distant metrics, spatial analysis, spatialization, textual criticism",
author = "{Van Altena}, Vincent and Jan Krans and Henk Bakker and Bal{\'a}sz Dukai and Jantien Stoter",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/opth-2019-0004",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "44--65",
journal = "De Gruyter Open Theology",
issn = "2300-6579",
publisher = "De Gruyter",
number = "1",

}

Spatial analysis of new testament textual emendations utilizing confusion distances. / Van Altena, Vincent; Krans, Jan; Bakker, Henk; Dukai, Balász; Stoter, Jantien.

In: Open Theology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 44-65.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial analysis of new testament textual emendations utilizing confusion distances

AU - Van Altena, Vincent

AU - Krans, Jan

AU - Bakker, Henk

AU - Dukai, Balász

AU - Stoter, Jantien

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.

AB - Before the interpretation of any text can start, the original wording of the text itself must be critically established. Conventionally, this is done following qualitative criteria. This article, however, explores the application of spatial analyses to New Testament textual criticism by demonstrating how the Levenshtein edit distance could be adapted to calculate confusion distances for variant readings in New Testament manuscripts, i.e. the possibility that a (combination of) letter(s) is confused by another (combination of) letter(s). Subsequently the outcomes are translated to Euclidian space using classical Multi-Dimensional Scaling, which enables visualisation and spatial analyses (in this case not related to geographical space). The article focuses on the data preparation and algorithm to make the data suitable for spatial analyses, thus providing the New Testament textual critic with new analytical tools.

KW - conjectural criticism

KW - distant metrics

KW - spatial analysis

KW - spatialization

KW - textual criticism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068663221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068663221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/opth-2019-0004

DO - 10.1515/opth-2019-0004

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 44

EP - 65

JO - De Gruyter Open Theology

JF - De Gruyter Open Theology

SN - 2300-6579

IS - 1

ER -