Abstract
This paper presents two approaches that identify which parts of an implemented
grammar are used and which parts are computationally inactive. Our results lead to the
following insights: even small grammars contain noise due to revised analyses, removing
superfluous types from a grammar may help to detect errors in the original grammar and
at least half of the types defined in the grammars we investigated do not play a role in the
computational process of the grammar.
grammar are used and which parts are computationally inactive. Our results lead to the
following insights: even small grammars contain noise due to revised analyses, removing
superfluous types from a grammar may help to detect errors in the original grammar and
at least half of the types defined in the grammars we investigated do not play a role in the
computational process of the grammar.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 25th PACLIC |
| Pages | 236-244 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | PACLIC: Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation - Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Armenia Duration: 16 Dec 2011 → 18 Dec 2011 http://portal.cohass.ntu.edu.sg/PACLIC25/importantdates.asp |
Conference
| Conference | PACLIC |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Armenia |
| City | Singapore |
| Period | 16/12/11 → 18/12/11 |
| Internet address |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- implemented grammars
- HPSG
- typed feature structures
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Spring Cleaning and Grammar Compression: Two Techniques for Detection of Redundancy in HPSG Grammars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver