Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Staying on track: a bottom-up Paris-aligned pathway driven by COP initiatives

  • Mark Roelfsema*
  • , Ioannis Dafnomilis
  • , Michel den Elzen
  • , Mathijs Harmsen
  • , Harmen Sytze de Boer
  • , Jonathan Doelman
  • , Detlef van Vuuren
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The announcement of voluntary climate initiatives during recent Conferences of Parties (COPs) underscores the interplay between voluntary initiatives and the outcomes of the Global Stocktake and COP decisions. Harmonising the collective stocktake efforts with initiative goals facilitates developing pathways across specific thematic areas (e.g., sectors, greenhouse gases) towards achieving the Paris Agreement goals. The effectiveness of the initiatives is assessed by calculating their potential impact on greenhouse gas emissions, assuming full implementation by the signatories. Their alignment with the Paris temperature goals is assessed against 2 °C and 1.5 °C pathways. Two scenarios, based on signatory and full global participation, are compared with current policy scenarios and pathways consistent with below 2 °C and 1.5 °C (high overshoot). If country signatories implemented initiative targets domestically, projections for 2030 to 2050 are generally more ambitious than current policies, potentially decreasing global emissions by about 11%. Comparing full global implementation to below 2 °C or 1.5 °C pathways, the results are mixed. By 2030, most initiative goals align with 2 °C, but certain thematic areas are missing. A number of initiatives demonstrate ambition beyond 1.5 °C pathways, questioning their feasibility. Achieving all global initiative targets by 2030 consistent with the below 2 °C and 1.5 °C (high overshoot) pathways requires 5–8% additional reductions. Realising the full potential of these initiatives necessitates increasing ambition for specific goals by 2030, increasing and clarifying long-term ambition, expanding thematic coverage, and requiring concrete climate action plans. Within the UNFCCC, this can be facilitated by making Global Stocktake goals more explicit, based on COP initiatives.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100237
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy and Climate Change
Volume7
Early online date21 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026

Funding

This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Programme under grant agreement No. 101137625 (ACHIEVE).

FundersFunder number
European Commission101137625

    Keywords

    • Climate policy
    • Integrated assessment
    • Paris agreement
    • Scenario analysis
    • UNFCCC

    Cite this