Struggling or Succeeding in Science and Technology Education: Elementary School Students’ Individual Differences During Inquiry- and Design-Based Learning

Tessa Slim*, Johanna E. van Schaik, Marjolein Dobber, Anna C.G. Hotze, Maartje E.J. Raijmakers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to identify how elementary school students’ individual differences are related to their learning outcomes and learning process in science and technology (S&T) education, using a mixed methods design. At the start of the study, we assessed the reading comprehension, math skills, science skills, executive functions, coherence of speech, science curiosity and attitude toward S&T of 73 fifth and sixth graders. The students then received a four-lesson inquiry- and design-based learning unit on the concept of sound. Learning outcomes were measured through a pre- and post-test regarding students’ conceptual knowledge of sound, a practical assessment of design skills and a situational interest measure. A factor score regression model (N = 62) showed significant influence from prior conceptual knowledge and the latent factor “academic abilities” (reading, math, and science skills) on post conceptual knowledge. The latent factor “affective” (curiosity and attitude toward S&T) and to a lesser extend also prior conceptual knowledge were predictive of situational interest. Learning process was measured through individual interviews and student worksheets within a subsample (N = 24). We used latent profile analysis to identify three profiles based on students’ individual differences, from which the subsample for qualitative analyses was selected. Codes and themes that emerged from the qualitative analyses revealed differences between students from the three profiles. The results of this study show how different types of students succeed or struggle within S&T education, which is essential for teachers in order to differentiate their instruction and guidance. Differentiation aimed at supporting language and the integration of science into design, while facilitating a variety of learning activities and assessments that move beyond written assignments, could help achieve the most optimal learning conditions for each student.

Original languageEnglish
Article number842537
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalFrontiers in Education
Volume7
Issue numberJune
Early online date13 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the ‘Stichting tot behartiging van de belangen van RK opleidingsscholen Amsterdam e.o.’ and ‘Stichting tot Steun bij opleiding en begeleiding van leerkrachten in het christelijk basisonderwijs in Amsterdam e.o.’. We greatly appreciate Prof. Yves Rosseel for personal communication about the factor score regression analysis, and Pascalle Ruigrok, Elsje Landman, and Nicky de Vries for help in data collection and analysis.

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Slim, van Schaik, Dobber, Hotze and Raijmakers.

Keywords

  • design-based learning
  • individual differences
  • inquiry-based learning
  • mixed methods
  • science education
  • stem education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Struggling or Succeeding in Science and Technology Education: Elementary School Students’ Individual Differences During Inquiry- and Design-Based Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this