Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in periodontitis: an exploratory study using traditional targeted techniques and a next-generation sequencing

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Aim
To compare the results of two targeted techniques to an open-ended technique in periodontitis patients, differentiated on the basis of smoking habit.

Materials & Methods
Thirty periodontitis patients (15 smokers and 15 non-smokers) provided subgingival plaque samples for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, culturing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).

Results
No differences were found in the composition of the subgingival microbiome between smokers and non-smokers with culture and qPCR. With pyrosequencing, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) classified to genera Fusobacterium, Prevotella and Selenomonas were more abundant in smokers, while OTUs belonging to the genera Peptococcus and Capnocytophaga were more abundant in non-smokers. Principal coordinate analysis identified two clusters; one was composed mainly of smokers (80%) and revealed significantly lower taxonomic diversity, higher attachment loss and higher proportion of the genera Fusobacterium, Paludibacter and Desulfobubus.

Conclusion
In periodontitis, there is a difference in the composition of the subgingival microbiome between smokers and non-smokers, as revealed by pyrosequencing. This difference was not identified by the targeted techniques. Low taxonomic diversity was associated with higher disease severity, especially in smokers. This supports the hypothesis of the ecological microbial-host interaction in the severity of periodontal disease.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-492
JournalJournal of Clinical Periodontology
Volume40
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in periodontitis: an exploratory study using traditional targeted techniques and a next-generation sequencing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this