Submodels in Carnap's early axiomatics revisited

I. Loeb

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

G. Schiemer has recently ascribed to Carnap the so-called domains-as-fields conception of models, which he subsequently used to defend Carnap’s treatment of extremal axioms against J. Hintikka’s criticism that the number of tuples in a relation, and not the domain of discourse, is optimised in Carnap’s treatment. We will argue by a careful textual analysis, however, that this domains-as-fields conception cannot be applied to Carnap’s early semantics, because it includes a notion of submodel and subrelation that is not only absent from Carnap’s work at that time, but even contradicts it. As a consequence, Schiemer’s defense of Carnap’s extremal axioms against Hintikka’s criticism fails. We will reconcile Carnap’s treatment of extremal axioms and Hintikka’s observation by taking into account the practice of axiomatics in the early twentieth century. If one realises that, in Carnap’s time, a predicate for the domain of discourse was often introduced in the formal theory, and that Carnap defined such predicates from the basic relations of an axiom system, the apparent disagreement between optimising relations and optimising domains disappears.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-429
JournalErkenntnis
Volume79
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Submodels in Carnap's early axiomatics revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this