Abstract
This article reflects on some methodological issues in the study of tafsīr, taking the dissemination of the ideas of Ibn Arabī (d. 638/1240) on the non-perpetuity of the chastisement of Hell in Sufi tafsīr as a case study. I show that Ibn Arabī's ideas on the issue were hardly adopted by later Sufi commentators on the Qur ān. I investigate whether just as its exoteric counterpart, and despite the claim of Sufi tafsīr being rooted in 'experience' and thus being more 'original', Sufi tafsīr is 'genealogical' and is thus more conservative in its content. Although the Sufi genre of tafsīr generally seems more willing to include Sufi sayings and ideas from outside the boundaries of the genre, this does not make it adaptive of the non-mainstream ideas of Ibn Arabī on Hell proposed outside the genre. This brings up some considerations on the use and usability of tafsīr as a source of intellectual history.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 102-124 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Sufi Studies |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 1/2 |
Early online date | 5 Dec 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2018 |
Keywords
- Hell
- Ibn Arabī
- Ishārī tafsīr
- Mercy
- Qur ān commentaries
- Salvation
- Sufism