Suspended matter filtration causes a counterintuitive increase in UV-absorption

Louis Peperzak*, Jan Berend Willem Stuut, Hendrik Jan van der Woerd

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In water treatment, filtration is often a first step to avoid interference of chemical or UV-disinfection with suspended matter (SPM). Surprisingly, in testing a ballast water filter with 25 and 40 μm mesh screens, UV-absorption (A, 254 nm) of filtered water increased with the largest increase in the finest screen. The hypothesis that filtration partly removes large particles and partly replaces them with small unfiltered ones, leading to an overall increase in absorption, was tested by measuring particle counts, particle-size distributions (PSD) and by modeling the Mass Normalized Beam Attenuation Coefficient (A/SPM) before and after filtration. An independent model verification was made by measuring and modeling A/SPM of three differently sized Arizona test dust suspensions. It is concluded that filtration is a good pretreatment for chemical disinfection systems because it removes the suspended matter mass, but that the production of smaller particles increases UV-absorption and hence may reduce disinfection performance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number114012
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume183
Early online date24 Aug 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Jan-Berend W Stuut reports financial support and administrative support were provided by NIOZ - Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research. Jan-Berend W Stuut reports a relationship with NIOZ - Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research that includes: employment.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Keywords

  • Absorbance
  • Ballast water
  • Filtration
  • Hill model
  • Particle-size distribution
  • Suspended matter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Suspended matter filtration causes a counterintuitive increase in UV-absorption'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this