Suspicious of AI? Perceived autonomy and interdependence predict AI-related conspiracy beliefs

Qi Zhao*, Jan Willem van Prooijen, Xinying Jiang, Giuliana Spadaro

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, conspiracy theories have emerged that authorities will use AI to oppress humanity, or AI itself will. We propose that perceived high autonomy and low interdependence of AI increase AI-related conspiracy beliefs. Four studies (total N = 1897) have examined this line of reasoning. Study 1 (N = 300) supported the hypotheses in a correlational survey. Studies 2 (N = 400) and 3 (pre-registered; N = 400) manipulated the autonomy and interdependence of AI in experiments. Both studies found that higher autonomy and lower interdependence increased AI-related conspiracy beliefs, while perceived threat to society mediated these effects in most cases. Study 4 (pre-registered) replicated findings from Study 2 in the United States (N = 400) and China (N = 397) and found cultural differences in AI-related conspiracy beliefs. These findings illuminate how the perceived properties of AI contribute to AI-related conspiracy beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12883
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
Volume64
Issue number2
Early online date1 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • autonomy
  • conspiracy theories
  • interdependence
  • threat perception

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Suspicious of AI? Perceived autonomy and interdependence predict AI-related conspiracy beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this