Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation

Aafke Fraaije, Steven M. Flipse

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The concept of Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) seems to gain initial momentum. The lack of collective meaning however, results in a plethora of publications, which describe RRI from ad hoc perspectives. To provide a robust foundation for scholars and practitioners seeking to implement RRI, we aim to integrate those perspectives through a literature review. We develop a practical framework for RRI, synthesized from earlier frameworks and ideas, that can be operationalized in research and innovation practice to help make RRI more tangible for scientists and engineers. We analyze policy papers, EU project proposals, and academic articles on RRI that appeared between 2011 and 2016 to identify common qualifiers of RRI. The resulting framework integrates a set of qualifiers that are central to the concept of ‘responsive’ research and innovation. The framework also allows identification of ‘RRI shortcuts’ to be avoided. We invite scholars to investigate the applicability of this framework as a means of shifting RRI from concept to practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Innovation
Momentum
Engineers

Keywords

  • document analysis
  • framework development
  • implementation
  • literature study
  • Responsible Research & Innovation

Cite this

@article{be9ca51294c24d0e92815655e4f1bcc9,
title = "Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation",
abstract = "The concept of Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) seems to gain initial momentum. The lack of collective meaning however, results in a plethora of publications, which describe RRI from ad hoc perspectives. To provide a robust foundation for scholars and practitioners seeking to implement RRI, we aim to integrate those perspectives through a literature review. We develop a practical framework for RRI, synthesized from earlier frameworks and ideas, that can be operationalized in research and innovation practice to help make RRI more tangible for scientists and engineers. We analyze policy papers, EU project proposals, and academic articles on RRI that appeared between 2011 and 2016 to identify common qualifiers of RRI. The resulting framework integrates a set of qualifiers that are central to the concept of ‘responsive’ research and innovation. The framework also allows identification of ‘RRI shortcuts’ to be avoided. We invite scholars to investigate the applicability of this framework as a means of shifting RRI from concept to practice.",
keywords = "document analysis, framework development, implementation, literature study, Responsible Research & Innovation",
author = "Aafke Fraaije and Flipse, {Steven M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685",
language = "English",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION",
issn = "2329-9460",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation. / Fraaije, Aafke; Flipse, Steven M.

In: JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 21.11.2019, p. 1-25.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation

AU - Fraaije, Aafke

AU - Flipse, Steven M.

PY - 2019/11/21

Y1 - 2019/11/21

N2 - The concept of Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) seems to gain initial momentum. The lack of collective meaning however, results in a plethora of publications, which describe RRI from ad hoc perspectives. To provide a robust foundation for scholars and practitioners seeking to implement RRI, we aim to integrate those perspectives through a literature review. We develop a practical framework for RRI, synthesized from earlier frameworks and ideas, that can be operationalized in research and innovation practice to help make RRI more tangible for scientists and engineers. We analyze policy papers, EU project proposals, and academic articles on RRI that appeared between 2011 and 2016 to identify common qualifiers of RRI. The resulting framework integrates a set of qualifiers that are central to the concept of ‘responsive’ research and innovation. The framework also allows identification of ‘RRI shortcuts’ to be avoided. We invite scholars to investigate the applicability of this framework as a means of shifting RRI from concept to practice.

AB - The concept of Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) seems to gain initial momentum. The lack of collective meaning however, results in a plethora of publications, which describe RRI from ad hoc perspectives. To provide a robust foundation for scholars and practitioners seeking to implement RRI, we aim to integrate those perspectives through a literature review. We develop a practical framework for RRI, synthesized from earlier frameworks and ideas, that can be operationalized in research and innovation practice to help make RRI more tangible for scientists and engineers. We analyze policy papers, EU project proposals, and academic articles on RRI that appeared between 2011 and 2016 to identify common qualifiers of RRI. The resulting framework integrates a set of qualifiers that are central to the concept of ‘responsive’ research and innovation. The framework also allows identification of ‘RRI shortcuts’ to be avoided. We invite scholars to investigate the applicability of this framework as a means of shifting RRI from concept to practice.

KW - document analysis

KW - framework development

KW - implementation

KW - literature study

KW - Responsible Research & Innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075451288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075451288&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685

DO - 10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685

M3 - Review article

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION

JF - JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION

SN - 2329-9460

ER -