Abstract
In a recent issue of this journal, we analyzed decision making about grant applications. We argued that there are many uncertainties in selecting the best talents, and we showed that in quite some cases (i) peer review scores hardly influence the decisions, and (ii) differences between success and no success are very small. The council we studied contested our conclusions. In this short article, we present additional evidence supporting our claims. © 2013 International Association of Universities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 421-427 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Higher Education Policy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Talent selection and the funding of research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver