Team confidence, motivated information processing, and dynamic group decision making

Carsten K W De Dreu*, Bianca Beersma

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    According to the Motivated Information Processing in Groups (MIP-G) model, groups should perform ambiguous (non-ambiguous) tasks better when they have high (low) epistemic motivation and concomitant tendencies to engage in systematic (heuristic) information processing and exchange. The authors tested this prediction in an experiment with four-person groups performing a complex and dynamic decision making task. Group confidence was measured after extensive training and prior to actual group decision-making. Task ambiguity was manipulated. Results showed that when task ambiguity was low, group confidence indeed benefits decision quality and group performance. But when task ambiguity was high, group confidence hurt decision quality and group performance. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1110-1119
    Number of pages10
    JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume40
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Team confidence, motivated information processing, and dynamic group decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this