The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability

B.R. Spisak, A.E. Grabo, R.D. Arvey, M. van Vugt

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The current contribution extends theorizing on leadership and the exploration-exploitation dilemma using an evolutionary perspective. A theoretical connection is made between the exploration-exploitation dilemma and age-biased leadership preferences for exploratory change versus stable exploitation. For the majority of human evolution our species was semi- or entirely nomadic and the trade-off between exploration versus exploitation had substantial physical- and experience-based requirements which align with leadership opportunities as moderated by age. Thus, given the consistency and importance of correctly assigning leadership for the exploration-exploitation dilemma, human evolution has likely selected for age-biased leadership endorsement. Across three experiments we find that younger-looking leaders are endorsed for times of exploratory change and older-looking leaders for stable exploitation. Further, our results indicated that older leaders are endorsed for leading conservative exploitation of nonrenewable resources and younger leaders for exploration of renewable alternatives (i.e., green leadership). The results introduce an age-biased leadership endorsement hypothesis.
LanguageEnglish
Pages805-816
JournalThe Leadership Quarterly
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date10 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

exploitation
leadership
leader
Exploitation
Exploration and exploitation
experiment
resources
experience

Cite this

@article{e1dd5243123443ca8f64ceefc04549b2,
title = "The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability",
abstract = "The current contribution extends theorizing on leadership and the exploration-exploitation dilemma using an evolutionary perspective. A theoretical connection is made between the exploration-exploitation dilemma and age-biased leadership preferences for exploratory change versus stable exploitation. For the majority of human evolution our species was semi- or entirely nomadic and the trade-off between exploration versus exploitation had substantial physical- and experience-based requirements which align with leadership opportunities as moderated by age. Thus, given the consistency and importance of correctly assigning leadership for the exploration-exploitation dilemma, human evolution has likely selected for age-biased leadership endorsement. Across three experiments we find that younger-looking leaders are endorsed for times of exploratory change and older-looking leaders for stable exploitation. Further, our results indicated that older leaders are endorsed for leading conservative exploitation of nonrenewable resources and younger leaders for exploration of renewable alternatives (i.e., green leadership). The results introduce an age-biased leadership endorsement hypothesis.",
author = "B.R. Spisak and A.E. Grabo and R.D. Arvey and {van Vugt}, M.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "805--816",
journal = "The Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability. / Spisak, B.R.; Grabo, A.E.; Arvey, R.D.; van Vugt, M.

In: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2014, p. 805-816.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The age of exploration and exploitation: Younger-looking leaders endorsed for change and older-looking leaders endorsed for stability

AU - Spisak, B.R.

AU - Grabo, A.E.

AU - Arvey, R.D.

AU - van Vugt, M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The current contribution extends theorizing on leadership and the exploration-exploitation dilemma using an evolutionary perspective. A theoretical connection is made between the exploration-exploitation dilemma and age-biased leadership preferences for exploratory change versus stable exploitation. For the majority of human evolution our species was semi- or entirely nomadic and the trade-off between exploration versus exploitation had substantial physical- and experience-based requirements which align with leadership opportunities as moderated by age. Thus, given the consistency and importance of correctly assigning leadership for the exploration-exploitation dilemma, human evolution has likely selected for age-biased leadership endorsement. Across three experiments we find that younger-looking leaders are endorsed for times of exploratory change and older-looking leaders for stable exploitation. Further, our results indicated that older leaders are endorsed for leading conservative exploitation of nonrenewable resources and younger leaders for exploration of renewable alternatives (i.e., green leadership). The results introduce an age-biased leadership endorsement hypothesis.

AB - The current contribution extends theorizing on leadership and the exploration-exploitation dilemma using an evolutionary perspective. A theoretical connection is made between the exploration-exploitation dilemma and age-biased leadership preferences for exploratory change versus stable exploitation. For the majority of human evolution our species was semi- or entirely nomadic and the trade-off between exploration versus exploitation had substantial physical- and experience-based requirements which align with leadership opportunities as moderated by age. Thus, given the consistency and importance of correctly assigning leadership for the exploration-exploitation dilemma, human evolution has likely selected for age-biased leadership endorsement. Across three experiments we find that younger-looking leaders are endorsed for times of exploratory change and older-looking leaders for stable exploitation. Further, our results indicated that older leaders are endorsed for leading conservative exploitation of nonrenewable resources and younger leaders for exploration of renewable alternatives (i.e., green leadership). The results introduce an age-biased leadership endorsement hypothesis.

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.001

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 805

EP - 816

JO - The Leadership Quarterly

T2 - The Leadership Quarterly

JF - The Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 5

ER -