The association between the behavior rating inventory of executive functioning and cognitive testing in children diagnosed with a brain tumor

M. de Vries, M. A. de Ruiter, K. J. Oostrom, A. Y.N. Schouten-Van Meeteren, H. Maurice-Stam, J. Oosterlaan, M. A. Grootenhuis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) suffer from cognitive late effects, such as deteriorating executive functioning (EF). We explored the suitability of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to screen for these late effects. We assessed the relationship between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher, and we explored the clinical utility. Eighty-two PBTS (8–18 years) were assessed with EF tasks measuring attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, visual-, and working memory (WM), and with the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher. Pearson’s correlations between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher were calculated. The BRIEF-Parent related poorly to EF tasks (rs <.26, ps >.01), but of the BRIEF-Teacher the WM-scale, Monitor-scale, Behavioral-Regulation-Index, and Meta-cognition-Index, and Total-score (rs >.31, ps <.01) related significantly to some EF tasks. When controlling for age, only the WM scale and Total score related significantly to the attention task (ps <.01). The inhibit scales of the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher correlated significantly (r =.33, p <.01). Children with clinically elevated scores on BRIEF scales that correlated with EF tasks performed worse on all EF tasks (ds 0.56–1.23, ps <.05). The BRIEF-Teacher Total and Index scores might better screen general EF in PBTS than the BRIEF-Parent. However, the BRIEF-Teacher is also not specific enough to capture separate EFs. Solely relying on the BRIEF as a screening measure of EFs in BPTS is insufficient. Questionnaires and tasks give distinctive, valuable information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)844-858
Number of pages15
JournalChild Neuropsychology
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Brain Neoplasms
Equipment and Supplies
Short-Term Memory
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • cognitive screening
  • executive functions
  • Pediatric brain tumor survivors

Cite this

de Vries, M. ; de Ruiter, M. A. ; Oostrom, K. J. ; Schouten-Van Meeteren, A. Y.N. ; Maurice-Stam, H. ; Oosterlaan, J. ; Grootenhuis, M. A. / The association between the behavior rating inventory of executive functioning and cognitive testing in children diagnosed with a brain tumor. In: Child Neuropsychology. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 844-858.
@article{932347b981db494783d75d9ea18fb69e,
title = "The association between the behavior rating inventory of executive functioning and cognitive testing in children diagnosed with a brain tumor",
abstract = "Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) suffer from cognitive late effects, such as deteriorating executive functioning (EF). We explored the suitability of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to screen for these late effects. We assessed the relationship between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher, and we explored the clinical utility. Eighty-two PBTS (8–18 years) were assessed with EF tasks measuring attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, visual-, and working memory (WM), and with the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher. Pearson’s correlations between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher were calculated. The BRIEF-Parent related poorly to EF tasks (rs <.26, ps >.01), but of the BRIEF-Teacher the WM-scale, Monitor-scale, Behavioral-Regulation-Index, and Meta-cognition-Index, and Total-score (rs >.31, ps <.01) related significantly to some EF tasks. When controlling for age, only the WM scale and Total score related significantly to the attention task (ps <.01). The inhibit scales of the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher correlated significantly (r =.33, p <.01). Children with clinically elevated scores on BRIEF scales that correlated with EF tasks performed worse on all EF tasks (ds 0.56–1.23, ps <.05). The BRIEF-Teacher Total and Index scores might better screen general EF in PBTS than the BRIEF-Parent. However, the BRIEF-Teacher is also not specific enough to capture separate EFs. Solely relying on the BRIEF as a screening measure of EFs in BPTS is insufficient. Questionnaires and tasks give distinctive, valuable information.",
keywords = "cognitive screening, executive functions, Pediatric brain tumor survivors",
author = "{de Vries}, M. and {de Ruiter}, {M. A.} and Oostrom, {K. J.} and {Schouten-Van Meeteren}, {A. Y.N.} and H. Maurice-Stam and J. Oosterlaan and Grootenhuis, {M. A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/09297049.2017.1350262",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "844--858",
journal = "Child Neuropsychology",
issn = "0929-7049",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

The association between the behavior rating inventory of executive functioning and cognitive testing in children diagnosed with a brain tumor. / de Vries, M.; de Ruiter, M. A.; Oostrom, K. J.; Schouten-Van Meeteren, A. Y.N.; Maurice-Stam, H.; Oosterlaan, J.; Grootenhuis, M. A.

In: Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 24, No. 6, 18.08.2018, p. 844-858.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The association between the behavior rating inventory of executive functioning and cognitive testing in children diagnosed with a brain tumor

AU - de Vries, M.

AU - de Ruiter, M. A.

AU - Oostrom, K. J.

AU - Schouten-Van Meeteren, A. Y.N.

AU - Maurice-Stam, H.

AU - Oosterlaan, J.

AU - Grootenhuis, M. A.

PY - 2018/8/18

Y1 - 2018/8/18

N2 - Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) suffer from cognitive late effects, such as deteriorating executive functioning (EF). We explored the suitability of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to screen for these late effects. We assessed the relationship between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher, and we explored the clinical utility. Eighty-two PBTS (8–18 years) were assessed with EF tasks measuring attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, visual-, and working memory (WM), and with the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher. Pearson’s correlations between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher were calculated. The BRIEF-Parent related poorly to EF tasks (rs <.26, ps >.01), but of the BRIEF-Teacher the WM-scale, Monitor-scale, Behavioral-Regulation-Index, and Meta-cognition-Index, and Total-score (rs >.31, ps <.01) related significantly to some EF tasks. When controlling for age, only the WM scale and Total score related significantly to the attention task (ps <.01). The inhibit scales of the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher correlated significantly (r =.33, p <.01). Children with clinically elevated scores on BRIEF scales that correlated with EF tasks performed worse on all EF tasks (ds 0.56–1.23, ps <.05). The BRIEF-Teacher Total and Index scores might better screen general EF in PBTS than the BRIEF-Parent. However, the BRIEF-Teacher is also not specific enough to capture separate EFs. Solely relying on the BRIEF as a screening measure of EFs in BPTS is insufficient. Questionnaires and tasks give distinctive, valuable information.

AB - Pediatric brain tumor survivors (PBTS) suffer from cognitive late effects, such as deteriorating executive functioning (EF). We explored the suitability of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) to screen for these late effects. We assessed the relationship between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher, and we explored the clinical utility. Eighty-two PBTS (8–18 years) were assessed with EF tasks measuring attention, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, visual-, and working memory (WM), and with the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher. Pearson’s correlations between the BRIEF and EF tasks, and between the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher were calculated. The BRIEF-Parent related poorly to EF tasks (rs <.26, ps >.01), but of the BRIEF-Teacher the WM-scale, Monitor-scale, Behavioral-Regulation-Index, and Meta-cognition-Index, and Total-score (rs >.31, ps <.01) related significantly to some EF tasks. When controlling for age, only the WM scale and Total score related significantly to the attention task (ps <.01). The inhibit scales of the BRIEF-Parent and BRIEF-Teacher correlated significantly (r =.33, p <.01). Children with clinically elevated scores on BRIEF scales that correlated with EF tasks performed worse on all EF tasks (ds 0.56–1.23, ps <.05). The BRIEF-Teacher Total and Index scores might better screen general EF in PBTS than the BRIEF-Parent. However, the BRIEF-Teacher is also not specific enough to capture separate EFs. Solely relying on the BRIEF as a screening measure of EFs in BPTS is insufficient. Questionnaires and tasks give distinctive, valuable information.

KW - cognitive screening

KW - executive functions

KW - Pediatric brain tumor survivors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023208596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023208596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09297049.2017.1350262

DO - 10.1080/09297049.2017.1350262

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 844

EP - 858

JO - Child Neuropsychology

JF - Child Neuropsychology

SN - 0929-7049

IS - 6

ER -