TY - JOUR
T1 - The associations between daily reports of loneliness and psychotic experiences in the early risk stages for psychosis
AU - Raposo de Almeida, Esdras
AU - van der Tuin, Sara
AU - Muller, Merel K.
AU - van den Berg, David
AU - Wang, Yuan Pang
AU - Veling, Wim
AU - Booij, Sanne H.
AU - Wigman, Johanna T.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Early Intervention in Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Aim: Bi-directional associations between loneliness and psychotic experiences (PEs) have been reported, but the mechanisms underlying these associations are unknown. This study aims to explore associations between daily reports of loneliness and PEs, and test differences in this association across young adult individuals at different levels of risk for psychosis. Methods: We analysed 90-day diary data on loneliness and PEs from N = 96 participants (mean age 24.7, range 18–35, 77% female) divided into 4 subgroups, each indexing increased levels of risk for psychosis according to the clinical staging model: ‘psychometric’ (n = 25), ‘low’ (n = 27), ‘mild’ (n = 24), and ‘ultra-high’(n = 20) risk. Multilevel vector autoregressive models examined within-day (contemporaneous) and between-day (temporal) associations between loneliness and PEs for the total sample. Next, these associations were compared across subgroups. Results: Loneliness and PEs were significantly associated contemporaneously (partial correlation B = 0.14) but not temporally. Subgroup membership moderated both contemporaneous and temporal associations. The contemporaneous association between loneliness and PEs was stronger in the low-risk subgroup compared to the mild-risk (B = −0.35, p <.01) and ultra-high-risk (B = −0.36, p <.01) subgroups. The temporal association between loneliness on the previous day and PEs on the current day was stronger in mild-risk subgroup compared to the ultra-high-risk subgroup (B = −0.03, p =.03). After adjusting for multiple testing, only the contemporaneous—but not the temporal—associations remained statistically significant. Conclusions: Loneliness is associated with PEs in individuals at risk for psychosis, particularly in those with low to mild symptoms. Our findings tentatively suggest that especially individuals with low expressions of PEs may be more sensitive to social context, but future studies are needed to replicate and further unravel the potentially stage-specific interplay between social context and PEs.
AB - Aim: Bi-directional associations between loneliness and psychotic experiences (PEs) have been reported, but the mechanisms underlying these associations are unknown. This study aims to explore associations between daily reports of loneliness and PEs, and test differences in this association across young adult individuals at different levels of risk for psychosis. Methods: We analysed 90-day diary data on loneliness and PEs from N = 96 participants (mean age 24.7, range 18–35, 77% female) divided into 4 subgroups, each indexing increased levels of risk for psychosis according to the clinical staging model: ‘psychometric’ (n = 25), ‘low’ (n = 27), ‘mild’ (n = 24), and ‘ultra-high’(n = 20) risk. Multilevel vector autoregressive models examined within-day (contemporaneous) and between-day (temporal) associations between loneliness and PEs for the total sample. Next, these associations were compared across subgroups. Results: Loneliness and PEs were significantly associated contemporaneously (partial correlation B = 0.14) but not temporally. Subgroup membership moderated both contemporaneous and temporal associations. The contemporaneous association between loneliness and PEs was stronger in the low-risk subgroup compared to the mild-risk (B = −0.35, p <.01) and ultra-high-risk (B = −0.36, p <.01) subgroups. The temporal association between loneliness on the previous day and PEs on the current day was stronger in mild-risk subgroup compared to the ultra-high-risk subgroup (B = −0.03, p =.03). After adjusting for multiple testing, only the contemporaneous—but not the temporal—associations remained statistically significant. Conclusions: Loneliness is associated with PEs in individuals at risk for psychosis, particularly in those with low to mild symptoms. Our findings tentatively suggest that especially individuals with low expressions of PEs may be more sensitive to social context, but future studies are needed to replicate and further unravel the potentially stage-specific interplay between social context and PEs.
KW - clinical staging
KW - diary study
KW - loneliness
KW - multilevel vector autoregression
KW - psychosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191324321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85191324321&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/eip.13537
DO - 10.1111/eip.13537
M3 - Article
C2 - 38661051
AN - SCOPUS:85191324321
SN - 1751-7885
VL - 18
SP - 930
EP - 942
JO - EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY
JF - EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY
IS - 11
ER -