Abstract
With great pleasure I studied the commentaries of my esteemed colleagues to my opinion paper “The Attentional Capture Debate: When Can We avoid Salient Distractors and When Not?” (Theeuwes, 2023). I thought the comments were to-the-point and provocative and I believe that these kinds of exchanges will help the field to move forward in this debate. I discuss the most pressing concerns in separate sections where I have grouped commonly raised issues.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 40 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Cognition |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 6 Jul 2023 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s).
Funding
This work is supported by a European Research Council (ERC) advanced grant 833029 – [LEARNATTEND] to Jan Theeuwes.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| European Research Council | |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 833029 |
Keywords
- attention capture
- attentional suppression
- visual search
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Attentional Window, Search Difficulty and Search Modes: A Reply to Commentaries on Theeuwes (2023)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver