The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance

T. H. Morrison*, W. N. Adger, K. Brown, M. C. Lemos, D. Huitema, J. Phelps, L. Evans, P. Cohen, A. M. Song, R. Turner, T. Quinn, T. P. Hughes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalShort surveyAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Failure to address unsustainable global change is often attributed to failures in conventional environmental governance. Polycentric environmental governance—the popular alternative—involves many centres of authority interacting coherently for a common governance goal. Yet, longitudinal analysis reveals many polycentric systems are struggling to cope with the growing impacts, pace, and scope of social and environmental change. Analytic shortcomings are also beginning to appear, particularly in the treatment of power. Here we draw together diverse social science perspectives and research into a variety of cases to show how different types of power shape rule setting, issue construction, and policy implementation in polycentric governance. We delineate an important and emerging research agenda for polycentric environmental governance, integrating diverse types of power into analytical and practical models.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101934
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalGlobal Environmental Change
Volume57
Early online date20 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • Environmental governance
  • Polycentric governance
  • Power

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this