The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury: A graph theoretical approach

Frank Jonker, Wouter Weeda, Kim Rauwerda, Erik Scherder

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The assumption is that executive dysfunctions (EF), associated with frontal lobe injury, are responsible for behavioral disturbances. Some studies do not find a relationship between EF and behavior following frontal lobe lesions. Our main goal of this study was to use a novel statistical method, graph theory, to analyze this relationship in different brain injury groups; frontal lobe damage, non-frontal lobe damage, and controls. Within the frontal group, we expect to find a pattern of executive nodes that are highly interconnected. Methods: For each group, we modeled the relationship between executive functions and behavior as a network of interdependent variables. The cognitive tests and the behavioral questionnaire are the “nodes” in the network, while the relationships between the nodes were modeled as the correlations between two nodes corrected for the correlation with all other nodes in the network. Sparse networks were estimated within each group using graphical LASSO. We analyzed the relative importance of the nodes within a network (centrality) and the clustering (modularity) of the different nodes. Results: Network analysis showed distinct patterns of relationships between EF and behavior in the three subgroups. The performance on the verbal learning test is the most central node in all the networks. In the frontal group, verbal memory forms a community with working memory and fluency. The behavioral nodes do not differentiate between groups or form clusters with cognitive nodes. No other communities were found for cognitive and behavioral nodes. Conclusion: The cognitive phenotype of the frontal lobe damaged group, with its stability and proportion, might be theoretically interpreted as a potential “buffer” for possible cognitive executive deficits. This might explain some of the ambiguity found in the literature. This alternative approach on cognitive test scores provides a different and possibly complimentary perspective of the neuropsychology of brain-injured patients.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere01208
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
JournalBrain and Behavior
Volume9
Issue number3
Early online date6 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Frontal Lobe
Brain Injuries
Cognition
Neuropsychology
Verbal Learning
Executive Function
Short-Term Memory
Cluster Analysis
Buffers
Phenotype
Wounds and Injuries
Brain

Keywords

  • behavior
  • brain Injury
  • executive functions
  • frontal lobe
  • graph theory

Cite this

Jonker, Frank ; Weeda, Wouter ; Rauwerda, Kim ; Scherder, Erik. / The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury : A graph theoretical approach. In: Brain and Behavior. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 1-13.
@article{dcd67c6e36da4e84a5676e32fb8bce7c,
title = "The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury: A graph theoretical approach",
abstract = "Background: The assumption is that executive dysfunctions (EF), associated with frontal lobe injury, are responsible for behavioral disturbances. Some studies do not find a relationship between EF and behavior following frontal lobe lesions. Our main goal of this study was to use a novel statistical method, graph theory, to analyze this relationship in different brain injury groups; frontal lobe damage, non-frontal lobe damage, and controls. Within the frontal group, we expect to find a pattern of executive nodes that are highly interconnected. Methods: For each group, we modeled the relationship between executive functions and behavior as a network of interdependent variables. The cognitive tests and the behavioral questionnaire are the “nodes” in the network, while the relationships between the nodes were modeled as the correlations between two nodes corrected for the correlation with all other nodes in the network. Sparse networks were estimated within each group using graphical LASSO. We analyzed the relative importance of the nodes within a network (centrality) and the clustering (modularity) of the different nodes. Results: Network analysis showed distinct patterns of relationships between EF and behavior in the three subgroups. The performance on the verbal learning test is the most central node in all the networks. In the frontal group, verbal memory forms a community with working memory and fluency. The behavioral nodes do not differentiate between groups or form clusters with cognitive nodes. No other communities were found for cognitive and behavioral nodes. Conclusion: The cognitive phenotype of the frontal lobe damaged group, with its stability and proportion, might be theoretically interpreted as a potential “buffer” for possible cognitive executive deficits. This might explain some of the ambiguity found in the literature. This alternative approach on cognitive test scores provides a different and possibly complimentary perspective of the neuropsychology of brain-injured patients.",
keywords = "behavior, brain Injury, executive functions, frontal lobe, graph theory",
author = "Frank Jonker and Wouter Weeda and Kim Rauwerda and Erik Scherder",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/brb3.1208",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "Brain and Behavior",
issn = "2162-3279",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury : A graph theoretical approach. / Jonker, Frank; Weeda, Wouter; Rauwerda, Kim; Scherder, Erik.

In: Brain and Behavior, Vol. 9, No. 3, e01208, 03.2019, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The bridge between cognition and behavior in acquired brain injury

T2 - Brain and Behavior

AU - Jonker, Frank

AU - Weeda, Wouter

AU - Rauwerda, Kim

AU - Scherder, Erik

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Background: The assumption is that executive dysfunctions (EF), associated with frontal lobe injury, are responsible for behavioral disturbances. Some studies do not find a relationship between EF and behavior following frontal lobe lesions. Our main goal of this study was to use a novel statistical method, graph theory, to analyze this relationship in different brain injury groups; frontal lobe damage, non-frontal lobe damage, and controls. Within the frontal group, we expect to find a pattern of executive nodes that are highly interconnected. Methods: For each group, we modeled the relationship between executive functions and behavior as a network of interdependent variables. The cognitive tests and the behavioral questionnaire are the “nodes” in the network, while the relationships between the nodes were modeled as the correlations between two nodes corrected for the correlation with all other nodes in the network. Sparse networks were estimated within each group using graphical LASSO. We analyzed the relative importance of the nodes within a network (centrality) and the clustering (modularity) of the different nodes. Results: Network analysis showed distinct patterns of relationships between EF and behavior in the three subgroups. The performance on the verbal learning test is the most central node in all the networks. In the frontal group, verbal memory forms a community with working memory and fluency. The behavioral nodes do not differentiate between groups or form clusters with cognitive nodes. No other communities were found for cognitive and behavioral nodes. Conclusion: The cognitive phenotype of the frontal lobe damaged group, with its stability and proportion, might be theoretically interpreted as a potential “buffer” for possible cognitive executive deficits. This might explain some of the ambiguity found in the literature. This alternative approach on cognitive test scores provides a different and possibly complimentary perspective of the neuropsychology of brain-injured patients.

AB - Background: The assumption is that executive dysfunctions (EF), associated with frontal lobe injury, are responsible for behavioral disturbances. Some studies do not find a relationship between EF and behavior following frontal lobe lesions. Our main goal of this study was to use a novel statistical method, graph theory, to analyze this relationship in different brain injury groups; frontal lobe damage, non-frontal lobe damage, and controls. Within the frontal group, we expect to find a pattern of executive nodes that are highly interconnected. Methods: For each group, we modeled the relationship between executive functions and behavior as a network of interdependent variables. The cognitive tests and the behavioral questionnaire are the “nodes” in the network, while the relationships between the nodes were modeled as the correlations between two nodes corrected for the correlation with all other nodes in the network. Sparse networks were estimated within each group using graphical LASSO. We analyzed the relative importance of the nodes within a network (centrality) and the clustering (modularity) of the different nodes. Results: Network analysis showed distinct patterns of relationships between EF and behavior in the three subgroups. The performance on the verbal learning test is the most central node in all the networks. In the frontal group, verbal memory forms a community with working memory and fluency. The behavioral nodes do not differentiate between groups or form clusters with cognitive nodes. No other communities were found for cognitive and behavioral nodes. Conclusion: The cognitive phenotype of the frontal lobe damaged group, with its stability and proportion, might be theoretically interpreted as a potential “buffer” for possible cognitive executive deficits. This might explain some of the ambiguity found in the literature. This alternative approach on cognitive test scores provides a different and possibly complimentary perspective of the neuropsychology of brain-injured patients.

KW - behavior

KW - brain Injury

KW - executive functions

KW - frontal lobe

KW - graph theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063093205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063093205&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/brb3.1208

DO - 10.1002/brb3.1208

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - Brain and Behavior

JF - Brain and Behavior

SN - 2162-3279

IS - 3

M1 - e01208

ER -