The burden of secrecy? No effect on hill slant estimation and beanbag throwing

D. Pecher, H. Van Mierlo, R. Canal Bruland, R. Zeelenberg

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Slepian, Masicampo, Toosi, and Ambady (2012, Experiment 1) reported that participants who recalled a big secret estimated a hill as steeper than participants who recalled a small secret. This finding was interpreted as evidence that secrets are experienced as physical burdens. In 2 experiments, we tried to replicate this finding, but, despite larger power, did not find a difference in slant estimates between participants who recalled a big secret and those who recalled a small secret. This finding was further corroborated by a meta-analysis that included 8 published data sets of exact replications, which indicates that thinking of a big secret does not affect hill slant estimation. In a third experiment, we also failed to replicate the effect of recalling a secret on throwing a beanbag at a target (Slepian et al., 2012, Experiment 2). Together, our findings question the robustness of the original empirical findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e65-e72
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume144
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The burden of secrecy? No effect on hill slant estimation and beanbag throwing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this