Abstract
The case of Perovy v. Russia concerned a young boy who was, at the age of seven, subjected to a rite of blessing of a different belief than his own, on his first day of school. When the case was brought before the ECtHR, four out of three judges concluded that there was no violation of the parent's rights under Article 2 of Protocol no. 1, nor a violation their son's right under Article 9 of the Convention. This blog post places some question marks at the Court's reasoning.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Strasbourg Observers |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Dec 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Freedom of Religion
- Freedom of Education
- European Convention on Human Rights
- European Court of Human Rights
- Protocol No. 1
- Article 9
- Article 2
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Case of Perovy v. Russia: Dealing with the Right to Freedom of Religion in the Educational Sphere through Picking the Right Fruits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Perovy t. Rusland: gebreken aan de juridische vertaalslag van een emotionele kwestie
van Soolingen, I., Apr 2021, In: Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Mensenrechten (NJCM-bulletin). 46, 1, p. 31-42 12 p., 2021/4.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver