Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Chinese practice-oriented views of science and their political grounds

  • Yuanlin Guo*
  • , Hans Radder
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In China, practice-oriented views of science can be traced back to antiquity. In ancient times, the Chinese people independently created and developed application-oriented sciences, but they ignored basic science. In modern times, China learned and introduced Western science and technology as a practical instrument to protect the nation and make it prosperous and powerful. Through technology and production, science has been playing an immediate and major role in the development of socialism since 1949. Since 1978, the Chinese government has always emphasized that science and technology are the primary productive forces. From ancient times to the present, the practice-oriented views of science are grounded in politics. Science has been the handmaiden of politics since the Qin Dynasty. However, this state of affairs hinders the development of basic science, a science that is not oriented toward immediate application. It also hinders open-minded, critical reflection on the downsides or limits of science, which could draw on broader (moral, spiritual, or religious) values.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-614
Number of pages24
JournalZygon
Volume55
Issue number3
Early online date11 Aug 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2020

Funding

First author Yuanlin Guo thanks Gonzalo Munevar for helpful comments. The members of the research group Philosophy of Science and Technology of the Department of Philosophy at VU University Amsterdam provided several useful suggestions, which we included in our final version.

Keywords

  • China
  • history of science
  • lack of critical reflection
  • political grounds
  • practice-oriented views

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Chinese practice-oriented views of science and their political grounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this