The Concealment Controversy: Sexual Orientation, Discretion Reasoning and the Scope of Refugee Protection

Research output: Book / ReportBookAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The idea that a claim for international protection can be rejected on the basis that the claimant behave ‘discreetly’ in their country of origin has remained resilient in asylum claims based on sexual orientation, but also other grounds of claim. This is significant because requiring an asylum-seeker to forgo the reason for which they are persecuted questions the very rationale of refugee protection. This book represents the first principled examination of concealment in refugee law. Janna Wessels connects the different strands of the long-standing debate in both common and civil law jurisdictions and scholarship concerning the question of whether and under which circumstances a claimant must conceal to avoid persecution. In so doing, Wessels uncovers a fundamental tension at the core of the refugee concept. This approach permits the book to cast a fresh look at central notions and core debates of refugee law, such as persecution and the Convention grounds, and their intersection with human rights.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages320
ISBN (Electronic)9781108938402
ISBN (Print)9781108837095
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Concealment Controversy: Sexual Orientation, Discretion Reasoning and the Scope of Refugee Protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this