The conceptualization of RRI: An iterative approach

Pim Klaassen*, Frank Kupper, Sara Vermeulen, Michelle Rijnen, Eugen Popa, Jacqueline Broerse

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To stimulate research and innovation (R&I), to contribute to the solution of societal challenges and to align R&I with societal values, the European Commission has launched the governance framework of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). RRI figures in many high-level EU policies as a means to promote smart growth, and a growing community of R&I practitioners from both the public and private sectors appears committed to it. Although debates on what RRI precisely entails have not reached closure yet, RRI provides an interesting avenue to explore ways of making R&I more societally germane. While recognizing the usefulness of keeping critical reflection on RRI’s meaning alive, we suggest that to make the step from theorizing to implementation, RRI could benefit from a clearer conceptualization. This chapter presents the iterative trajectory in conceptualizing RRI followed as part of RRI Tools, one of a number of EC-funded research projects and support acts aimed at fleshing out what RRI can and should be, and the conceptualization of RRI that this led to. It suggests that RRI is best captured if in R&I governance attention is paid to the five p’s of Purpose, Products, Processes, Preconditions and People, and that further elaborations on the meaning of RRI should happen in dialogue with attempts at practicing RRI.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResponsible Innovation 3
Subtitle of host publicationA European Agenda?
PublisherSpringer International Publishing AG
Pages69-92
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9783319648347
ISBN (Print)9783319648330
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The conceptualization of RRI: An iterative approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this