The contribution of covariation to skill improvement is an ambiguous measure: comment on Muller and Sternad (2004)

J.B.J. Smeets, S. Louw

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    It has been proposed that it is possible to decompose changes in variability of human motor behavior into 3 independent components: covariation, task tolerance, and stochastic noise (H. Müller & D. Sternad, see record 2004-10560-014). The authors simulate learning to throw accurately and show that for this task the proposed analysis does not give an unambiguous answer to the question of what the 3 components contribute to the simulated skill improvement. It is argued that this is caused by the fact that the component covariation depends on the choice of control variables. The authors conclude that it is not possible to distinguish between the 3 components of noise reduction without knowing the controlled variables. Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)246-249
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
    Volume33
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The contribution of covariation to skill improvement is an ambiguous measure: comment on Muller and Sternad (2004)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this