Abstract
The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is a highly influential framework for studying human action. Research applying the TPB often follows the assumption that the framework – originally developed in the U.S. – is universal and can be effectively applied across geographical and cultural boundaries. With the power of meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM), we test the above assumption across Hofstede's and GLOBE's individualism-collectivism cultural dimensions. Specifically, we compare 3 variations of the TPB model that are evident in the literature. Our findings focus on the context of environmental behavior, and are based on 255 samples with 130,354 respondents from 50 countries. We show that adding personal norms to the TPB model in addition to subjective norms, the typically included dimension of the norm construct, moderately improves understanding of cross-cultural differences in environmental behavior.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 101593 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of Environmental Psychology |
Volume | 75 |
Early online date | 23 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Cross-cultural
- Environmental behavior
- Generalizations
- Meta-analysis
- Personal norms
- Structural equation modeling
- Theory of planned behavior (TPB)