Abstract
This article addresses the largely neglected issue of the decline of ethnic cleavages in plural societies as expressed in voting behaviour. It argues that theoretically, Creolization, a specific form of acculturation, accounts for the erosion of ethnic bonding but finds that the application of the concept is limited. Hence, the article combines the current concept of Creolization with that of political hegemony, while broadening Creolization to comprise the acculturation of several ethnic groups. However, the paper considers that actual voting patterns may be countervailed by party characteristics and election campaigns. Using multiple fieldwork methods, the erosion of ethnic voting loyalties is analysed in a case study of Suriname, a Caribbean society that is representative of a class of plural societies. The paper centres on the conceptual apparatus to analyse the erosion of ethnic voting loyalties rather than making comparisons. It claims that its argument is applicable to plural societies that are characterized by the erosion of voting loyalties and decline of ethnic cleavages, notably Trinidad and to a lesser degree in Mauritius and Fiji, and increasingly in Suriname and Guyana.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 395-410 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Politics |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 4 Jul 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2019 |
Keywords
- creolization
- ethnic politics
- hegemony
- plural societies
- voting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The decline of ethnic voting patterns in plural societies: Evidence from Suriname'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver