The Development of Capability Indicators and their Relation to Life Satisfaction’

Paul Anand, Graham Hunter, Ian Carter, Keith Dowding, Francesco Guala, Martin Van Hees, Martin Van

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper is motivated by sustained interest in the capabilities approach to welfare economics combined with the paucity of economic statistics that measure capabilities at the individual level. Specifically, it takes a much discussed account of the normatively desirable capabilities constitutive of a good life, argued to be comprehensive at a high level of abstraction, and uses it to operationalize the capabilities approach by developing a survey instrument to elicit information about capabilities at the individual level. The paper explores the extent to which these capabilities are covariates of a life satisfaction measure of utility and investigates aspects of robustness and subgroup differences using standard socio-demographic variables as well as a relatively novel control for personality. In substantial terms, we find there is some evidence of quantitative, but no qualitative, gender and age differences in the capabilities–life satisfaction relationship. Furthermore, we find that indicators from a wide range of life domains are linked to life satisfaction, a finding that supports multi-dimensional approaches to poverty and the non-materialist view that people do not just value financial income per se. Our most important contribution, however, is primarily methodological and derives from the demonstration that, within the conventions of household and social surveys, human capabilities can be measured with the aid of suitably designed statistical indicators.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-152
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Human Development and Capabilities
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Life satisfaction
Capability approach
Income
Poverty
Age differences
Robustness
Demographic variables
Welfare economics
Household
Covariates
Gender differences
Statistics
Relationship satisfaction
Economics

Cite this

Anand, Paul ; Hunter, Graham ; Carter, Ian ; Dowding, Keith ; Guala, Francesco ; Hees, Martin Van ; Van, Martin. / The Development of Capability Indicators and their Relation to Life Satisfaction’. In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 125-152.
@article{534f72c035b5456f84b1c3139ad03e38,
title = "The Development of Capability Indicators and their Relation to Life Satisfaction’",
abstract = "This paper is motivated by sustained interest in the capabilities approach to welfare economics combined with the paucity of economic statistics that measure capabilities at the individual level. Specifically, it takes a much discussed account of the normatively desirable capabilities constitutive of a good life, argued to be comprehensive at a high level of abstraction, and uses it to operationalize the capabilities approach by developing a survey instrument to elicit information about capabilities at the individual level. The paper explores the extent to which these capabilities are covariates of a life satisfaction measure of utility and investigates aspects of robustness and subgroup differences using standard socio-demographic variables as well as a relatively novel control for personality. In substantial terms, we find there is some evidence of quantitative, but no qualitative, gender and age differences in the capabilities–life satisfaction relationship. Furthermore, we find that indicators from a wide range of life domains are linked to life satisfaction, a finding that supports multi-dimensional approaches to poverty and the non-materialist view that people do not just value financial income per se. Our most important contribution, however, is primarily methodological and derives from the demonstration that, within the conventions of household and social surveys, human capabilities can be measured with the aid of suitably designed statistical indicators.",
author = "Paul Anand and Graham Hunter and Ian Carter and Keith Dowding and Francesco Guala and Hees, {Martin Van} and Martin Van",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/14649880802675366",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "125--152",
journal = "Journal of Human Development and Capabilities",
number = "1",

}

The Development of Capability Indicators and their Relation to Life Satisfaction’. / Anand, Paul; Hunter, Graham; Carter, Ian; Dowding, Keith; Guala, Francesco; Hees, Martin Van; Van, Martin.

In: Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2009, p. 125-152.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Development of Capability Indicators and their Relation to Life Satisfaction’

AU - Anand, Paul

AU - Hunter, Graham

AU - Carter, Ian

AU - Dowding, Keith

AU - Guala, Francesco

AU - Hees, Martin Van

AU - Van, Martin

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This paper is motivated by sustained interest in the capabilities approach to welfare economics combined with the paucity of economic statistics that measure capabilities at the individual level. Specifically, it takes a much discussed account of the normatively desirable capabilities constitutive of a good life, argued to be comprehensive at a high level of abstraction, and uses it to operationalize the capabilities approach by developing a survey instrument to elicit information about capabilities at the individual level. The paper explores the extent to which these capabilities are covariates of a life satisfaction measure of utility and investigates aspects of robustness and subgroup differences using standard socio-demographic variables as well as a relatively novel control for personality. In substantial terms, we find there is some evidence of quantitative, but no qualitative, gender and age differences in the capabilities–life satisfaction relationship. Furthermore, we find that indicators from a wide range of life domains are linked to life satisfaction, a finding that supports multi-dimensional approaches to poverty and the non-materialist view that people do not just value financial income per se. Our most important contribution, however, is primarily methodological and derives from the demonstration that, within the conventions of household and social surveys, human capabilities can be measured with the aid of suitably designed statistical indicators.

AB - This paper is motivated by sustained interest in the capabilities approach to welfare economics combined with the paucity of economic statistics that measure capabilities at the individual level. Specifically, it takes a much discussed account of the normatively desirable capabilities constitutive of a good life, argued to be comprehensive at a high level of abstraction, and uses it to operationalize the capabilities approach by developing a survey instrument to elicit information about capabilities at the individual level. The paper explores the extent to which these capabilities are covariates of a life satisfaction measure of utility and investigates aspects of robustness and subgroup differences using standard socio-demographic variables as well as a relatively novel control for personality. In substantial terms, we find there is some evidence of quantitative, but no qualitative, gender and age differences in the capabilities–life satisfaction relationship. Furthermore, we find that indicators from a wide range of life domains are linked to life satisfaction, a finding that supports multi-dimensional approaches to poverty and the non-materialist view that people do not just value financial income per se. Our most important contribution, however, is primarily methodological and derives from the demonstration that, within the conventions of household and social surveys, human capabilities can be measured with the aid of suitably designed statistical indicators.

U2 - 10.1080/14649880802675366

DO - 10.1080/14649880802675366

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 125

EP - 152

JO - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

JF - Journal of Human Development and Capabilities

IS - 1

ER -