Abstract
A major challenge for disaster scholars and policymakers is to understand the power dimension in response networks, particularly relating to collaboration and coordination. We propose a conceptual framework to study interests and negotiations in and between various civic and professional, response networks drawing on the concepts of “programming” and “switching” proposed by Manuel Castells in his work on the network society. Programming in disaster response refers to the ability to constitute response networks and to program/reprogram them in terms of the goals assigned to the network. Switching is the ability to connect different networks by sharing common goals and combining resources. We employ these concepts to understand how the US Federal Emergency Management Agency organized its response in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. Our conceptual framework can be used both by disaster scholars and policymakers to understand how networked power is constructed and utilized.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 418-433 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 24 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Authors. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.
Funding
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | 409-14-003 |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek |
Keywords
- coordination and collaboration
- crisis management
- disaster governance
- network governance
- networked power
- power
- programming and switching