TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of physiotherapists' explanation of therapeutic virtual reality on treatment expectations in healthy people and people with chronic musculoskeletal pain
T2 - Two online RCTs
AU - Slatman, Syl
AU - van Lankveld, Wim
AU - Staal, J. Bart
AU - van Goor, Harry
AU - Ostelo, Raymond
AU - Westendorp, Janine
AU - Knoop, Jesper
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2026/6
Y1 - 2026/6
N2 - Objectives: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a disabling condition, for which physiotherapy is a common treatment. Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) is an emerging treatment modality in physiotherapy care for patients with CMP. Treatment expectations of patients regarding therapeutic VR influence its effectiveness and could possibly be enhanced by the therapist by using positive language about therapeutic VR. The aim of the current studies was to explore the effect of physiotherapists explaining VR using positive versus neutral language, on treatment expectations of healthy participants (study 1) and patients with CMP (study 2). Methods: Two web-based, double-blinded RCTs were conducted with two groups (healthy participants and patients with CMP), that were randomly allocated to a video explaining therapeutic VR using positive language or neutral language. The primary outcome measures were treatment credibility and expectancy, assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Between-group differences and within-group changes were respectively analyzed using simple linear regression analyses and repeated measures ANOVAs. All analyses were performed separately for healthy participants and patients with CMP. Results: In total, 127 healthy participants (study 1) and 115 patients with CMP (study 2) were included and randomized. We found no between-group difference in treatment expectations between positive versus neutral language videos, neither in healthy participants nor patients with CMP. We found significant within-group changes for treatment expectations in both conditions (positive and neutral language) in healthy participants, and in the positive language condition only in the CMP group. Conclusions: The studies show that any explanation of therapeutic VR (both using positive or neutral language) seems to improve treatment expectations. Unexpectedly, using positive language was not superior to using neutral language. Future research should examine strategies for healthcare providers to set optimal treatment expectations on therapeutic VR in patients with CMP. Practice implications: A brief verbal explanation about therapeutic VR improves treatment expectations in both healthy participants and patients with CMP.
AB - Objectives: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a disabling condition, for which physiotherapy is a common treatment. Therapeutic virtual reality (VR) is an emerging treatment modality in physiotherapy care for patients with CMP. Treatment expectations of patients regarding therapeutic VR influence its effectiveness and could possibly be enhanced by the therapist by using positive language about therapeutic VR. The aim of the current studies was to explore the effect of physiotherapists explaining VR using positive versus neutral language, on treatment expectations of healthy participants (study 1) and patients with CMP (study 2). Methods: Two web-based, double-blinded RCTs were conducted with two groups (healthy participants and patients with CMP), that were randomly allocated to a video explaining therapeutic VR using positive language or neutral language. The primary outcome measures were treatment credibility and expectancy, assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Between-group differences and within-group changes were respectively analyzed using simple linear regression analyses and repeated measures ANOVAs. All analyses were performed separately for healthy participants and patients with CMP. Results: In total, 127 healthy participants (study 1) and 115 patients with CMP (study 2) were included and randomized. We found no between-group difference in treatment expectations between positive versus neutral language videos, neither in healthy participants nor patients with CMP. We found significant within-group changes for treatment expectations in both conditions (positive and neutral language) in healthy participants, and in the positive language condition only in the CMP group. Conclusions: The studies show that any explanation of therapeutic VR (both using positive or neutral language) seems to improve treatment expectations. Unexpectedly, using positive language was not superior to using neutral language. Future research should examine strategies for healthcare providers to set optimal treatment expectations on therapeutic VR in patients with CMP. Practice implications: A brief verbal explanation about therapeutic VR improves treatment expectations in both healthy participants and patients with CMP.
KW - Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP)
KW - Physiotherapy
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Therapeutic communication
KW - Virtual reality (VR)
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022113192
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105022113192&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100443
DO - 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100443
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105022113192
SN - 2772-6282
VL - 8
JO - PEC Innovation
JF - PEC Innovation
M1 - 100443
ER -