In the process of developing an observational instrument for assessing parental behavior for use in daily practice of child protection services and other institutions working with (at risk) families with young children, it is important to make sure that the scale instructions will reduce time of training and becoming a reliable coder as much as possible, that the format allows quick and efficient application in clinical use cases, and that repeated reliability checks can be easily configured to reduce coder drift. Establishing a positive user experience will also contribute to quick and efficient application. In order to gain information about what type of instruction, visual or written, will fit these requirements, the current study is being performed. The study tests whether videobased descriptions of scale anchors may contribute towards adapting rating scale instruments to become more efficient. Our hypothesis is that in the condition where raters use a video-scale, interrater reliability will be higher on average, interrater reliability will increase faster and the user experience will be more positive than in the condition where raters use a traditional written scale. The research is conducted with two groups of participants assigned to two research conditions, video-based anchors and text-based anchors. Each participant in both groups will observe six target videos and then rate parental sensitivity according to either the video-anchor scale or the text-anchor scale. Also, they will answer a questionnaire about their user experience. Rater accuracy, interrater reliability, mean time needed for coding, and user experience will be calculated for each condition, and compared between the two conditions to establish whether they differ significant. Results of this study are expected beginning of 2018.
|Number of pages||2|
|Publication status||Published - 26 May 2018|
|Event||WAIMH: 2018 - Rome, Italy|
Duration: 26 May 2018 → 30 May 2018
|Period||26/05/18 → 30/05/18|