The effectiveness of MiFID provisions for professional clients: a critical review

Tom Loonen*, Randy Pattiselanno

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to identify the duty of care that applies to ‘professionally classified clients’ based on the recently implemented Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) as well as the previous Markets in Financial Instruments Directive I (MiFID I). The authors place critical notes on the effectiveness of some MiFID provisions. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have reviewed the Delegated Acts of MiFID I and II, as well as Q&A’s of the European Regulator, ESMA and jurisprudence. The authors aim to add value by facilitating a discussion on the effectiveness of applicable MiFID provisions. Findings: This review of the legal provisions provides researchers and practitioners in the investment sectors with a clear overview of the legal provisions detailing how these provisions should be met and how improvements to the provisions can be achieved. Practical implications: This paper specifies what the provisions for professional classified clients are and facilitates a discussion on the effectiveness of these provisions. Originality/value: Addressing the legal provisions which are applicable to ‘professional classified clients’ that derive from MiFID I and II and includes a critical analysis which offers an original perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance
Volume28
Issue number1
Early online date2 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

  • Banking regulation
  • Duty of care
  • Effectiveness
  • Investor
  • MiFID II
  • Professional

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of MiFID provisions for professional clients: a critical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this