Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to identify the duty of care that applies to ‘professionally classified clients’ based on the recently implemented Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) as well as the previous Markets in Financial Instruments Directive I (MiFID I). The authors place critical notes on the effectiveness of some MiFID provisions. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have reviewed the Delegated Acts of MiFID I and II, as well as Q&A’s of the European Regulator, ESMA and jurisprudence. The authors aim to add value by facilitating a discussion on the effectiveness of applicable MiFID provisions. Findings: This review of the legal provisions provides researchers and practitioners in the investment sectors with a clear overview of the legal provisions detailing how these provisions should be met and how improvements to the provisions can be achieved. Practical implications: This paper specifies what the provisions for professional classified clients are and facilitates a discussion on the effectiveness of these provisions. Originality/value: Addressing the legal provisions which are applicable to ‘professional classified clients’ that derive from MiFID I and II and includes a critical analysis which offers an original perspective.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 2 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Jan 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Keywords
- Banking regulation
- Duty of care
- Effectiveness
- Investor
- MiFID II
- Professional