TY - JOUR
T1 - The effects of recent stressful life events on outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis
T2 - Results from the longitudinal EU-GEI high-risk study
AU - See, Cheryl R. Z.
AU - Si, Shuqing
AU - Hedges, Emily
AU - Tognin, Stefania
AU - Modinos, Gemma
AU - Van Der Gaag, Mark
AU - De Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Velthorst, Eva
AU - McGorry, Patrick
AU - Nelson, Barnaby
AU - Riecher-Rössler, Anita
AU - Bressan, Rodrigo
AU - Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
AU - Krebs, Marie-Odile
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
AU - Ruhrmann, Stephan
AU - Sachs, Gabriele
AU - Rutten, Bart P.
AU - Van Os, Jim
AU - McGuire, Philip
AU - Valmaggia, Lucia R.
AU - Kempton, Matthew J.
AU - McGuire, Philip
AU - Pisani, Sara
AU - Antoniades, Mathilde
AU - Calem, Maria
AU - Tognin, Stefania
AU - Modinos, Gemma
AU - De Haan, Lieuwe
AU - Van Der Gaag, Mark
AU - Velthorst, Eva
AU - Kraan, Tamar C.
AU - Van Dam, Daniella S.
AU - Burger, Nadine
AU - Nelson, Barnaby
AU - McGorry, Patrick
AU - Amminger, G. Paul
AU - Pantelis, Christos
AU - Politis, Athena
AU - Goodall, Joanne
AU - Riecher-Rössler, Anita
AU - Borgwardt, Stefan
AU - Studerus, Erich
AU - Bressan, Rodrigo
AU - Gadelha, Ary
AU - Brietzke, Elisa
AU - Asevedo, Graccielle
AU - Asevedo, Elson
AU - Zugman, Andre
AU - Barrantes-Vidal, Neus
AU - Domínguez-Martínez, Tecelli
AU - Racioppi, Anna
AU - Kwapil, Thomas R.
AU - Monsonet, Manel
AU - Hinojosa, Lídia
AU - Kazes, Mathilde
AU - Daban, Claire
AU - Bourgin, Julie
AU - Gay, Olivier
AU - Mam-Lam-Fook, Célia
AU - Krebs, Marie-Odile
AU - Nordholm, Dorte
AU - Randers, Lasse
AU - Krakauer, Kristine
AU - Glenthøj, Louise
AU - Glenthøj, Birte
AU - Nordentoft, Merete
AU - Ruhrmann, Stephan
AU - Gebhard, Dominika
AU - Arnhold, Julia
AU - Klosterkötter, Joachim
AU - Sachs, Gabriele
AU - Lasser, Iris
AU - Winklbaur, Bernadette
AU - Delespaul, Philippe A.
AU - Rutten, Bart P.
AU - Van Os, Jim
AU - EU-GEI High Risk Study
N1 - Published online: 08-01-2025
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background Recent stressful life events (SLE) are a risk factor for psychosis, but limited research has explored how SLEs affect individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. The current study investigated the longitudinal effects of SLEs on functioning and symptom severity in CHR individuals, where we hypothesized CHR would report more SLEs than healthy controls (HC), and SLEs would be associated with poorer outcomes. Methods The study used longitudinal data from the EU-GEI High Risk study. Data from 331 CHR participants were analyzed to examine the effects of SLEs on changes in functioning, positive and negative symptoms over a 2-year follow-up. We compared the prevalence of SLEs between CHR and HCs, and between CHR who did (CHR-T) and did not (CHR-NT) transition to psychosis. Results CHR reported 1.44 more SLEs than HC (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in SLEs between CHR-T and CHR-NT at baseline. Recent SLEs were associated with poorer functioning and more severe positive and negative symptoms in CHR individuals (all p < 0.01) but did not reveal a significant interaction with time. Conclusions CHR individuals who had experienced recent SLEs exhibited poorer functioning and more severe symptoms. However, as the interaction between SLEs and time was not significant, this suggests SLEs did not contribute to a worsening of symptoms and functioning over the study period. SLEs could be a key risk factor to becoming CHR for psychosis, however further work is required to inform when early intervention strategies mitigating against the effects of stress are most effective.
AB - Background Recent stressful life events (SLE) are a risk factor for psychosis, but limited research has explored how SLEs affect individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. The current study investigated the longitudinal effects of SLEs on functioning and symptom severity in CHR individuals, where we hypothesized CHR would report more SLEs than healthy controls (HC), and SLEs would be associated with poorer outcomes. Methods The study used longitudinal data from the EU-GEI High Risk study. Data from 331 CHR participants were analyzed to examine the effects of SLEs on changes in functioning, positive and negative symptoms over a 2-year follow-up. We compared the prevalence of SLEs between CHR and HCs, and between CHR who did (CHR-T) and did not (CHR-NT) transition to psychosis. Results CHR reported 1.44 more SLEs than HC (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in SLEs between CHR-T and CHR-NT at baseline. Recent SLEs were associated with poorer functioning and more severe positive and negative symptoms in CHR individuals (all p < 0.01) but did not reveal a significant interaction with time. Conclusions CHR individuals who had experienced recent SLEs exhibited poorer functioning and more severe symptoms. However, as the interaction between SLEs and time was not significant, this suggests SLEs did not contribute to a worsening of symptoms and functioning over the study period. SLEs could be a key risk factor to becoming CHR for psychosis, however further work is required to inform when early intervention strategies mitigating against the effects of stress are most effective.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214869983
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85214869983#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1017/S0033291724003039
DO - 10.1017/S0033291724003039
M3 - Article
SN - 0033-2917
VL - 54
SP - 4768
EP - 4778
JO - Psychological Medicine
JF - Psychological Medicine
IS - 16
ER -