The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put

Marjan Kok, Annet Komen, Laurien van Capelleveen, John van der Kamp

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Laboratory studies have shown that self-controlled (video) feedback benefits motor learning and self-motivational beliefs. These outcomes are relevant to Physical Education (PE), but need to be verified for PE settings, in which practice and feedback need to be organized in large groups rather than individually as is common in laboratory studies. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to examine the effects of self-controlled video feedback on students' motor learning and self-efficacy in a PE setting when students obtain feedback relatively independent of the teacher. The secondary aim was to examine to what extent self-control and self-efficacy during practice predicted students' motor learning. Method: Participants were 56 grade 1 students of a regular secondary school who practised the shot-put during four practice sessions organized during PE lessons. One class practised with self-controlled video feedback (SC-VF group, n = 22). They practised relatively independent of the teacher: peers filmed each other and analysed the recorded video with help from video applications, a video model and cue cards. A second class practised in a similar fashion. However, they were yoked to the first group and could not choose the timing and frequency of feedback delivery (externally controlled video feedback, EC-VF group, n = 17). A third group practised in a traditional way (teacher guided TG group, n = 17) with demonstrations, verbal instructions and feedback from a PE teacher. Shot-put distance, shot-put technique and self-efficacy were measured in a pre- (week 1), post- (week 8) and retention (week 9) test. During practice (weeks 2–7, including four practice sessions), students rated their self-efficacy. After the last practice session, students rated their perceptions towards practice (i.e. perceived enjoyment and perceived learning effect). Hierarchical two-stepped linear regression analyses were performed to explore whether the type of intervention (SC-VF, EC-VF or TG group) and self-efficacy during practice predicted motor learning. Findings: Results showed that shot-put distance and technique increased significantly after practice, without differences between groups. Self-efficacy improved significantly after practice for the SC-VF (from pre- to retention test) and the TG groups (from pre- to post- and retention test), but not for the EC-VF group. Furthermore, students in the SC-VF group reported a higher perceived learning effect, compared to students in the EC-VF group. No differences in perceived enjoyment were found. Finally, self-efficacy during practice predicted improvements in shot-put technique from pre- to retention test. Conclusion: Self-controlled video feedback without guidance of a teacher on movement technique led to similar learning effects as traditional guidance of the teacher in a PE context. Self-control of feedback delivery (i.e. timing and frequency) seemed to have positive effects on self-efficacy and perceived learning effect, but did not lead to superior motor learning or perceived enjoyment. This study indicates that self-controlled video feedback as applied in this study can be implemented in PE. Future research that investigates whether and how the application of self-controlled video feedback can be further optimized, also for different types of skills, is needed. Furthermore, monitoring the application of self-regulatory skills seems important for further understanding the effects of self-controlled video feedback.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-66
Number of pages18
JournalPhysical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date12 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Physical Education and Training
Self Efficacy
physical education
self-efficacy
video
Learning
learning
Students
learning success
Group
European Community
teacher
student
self-control
Practice (Psychology)
regular school
Cues
Linear Models
secondary school

Keywords

  • motor learning
  • Physical Education
  • self-controlled video feedback
  • self-efficacy
  • self-regulation

Cite this

@article{6edf50d2fbd144dda3c6761ec69515fd,
title = "The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting: an exploratory study on the shot-put",
abstract = "Background: Laboratory studies have shown that self-controlled (video) feedback benefits motor learning and self-motivational beliefs. These outcomes are relevant to Physical Education (PE), but need to be verified for PE settings, in which practice and feedback need to be organized in large groups rather than individually as is common in laboratory studies. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to examine the effects of self-controlled video feedback on students' motor learning and self-efficacy in a PE setting when students obtain feedback relatively independent of the teacher. The secondary aim was to examine to what extent self-control and self-efficacy during practice predicted students' motor learning. Method: Participants were 56 grade 1 students of a regular secondary school who practised the shot-put during four practice sessions organized during PE lessons. One class practised with self-controlled video feedback (SC-VF group, n = 22). They practised relatively independent of the teacher: peers filmed each other and analysed the recorded video with help from video applications, a video model and cue cards. A second class practised in a similar fashion. However, they were yoked to the first group and could not choose the timing and frequency of feedback delivery (externally controlled video feedback, EC-VF group, n = 17). A third group practised in a traditional way (teacher guided TG group, n = 17) with demonstrations, verbal instructions and feedback from a PE teacher. Shot-put distance, shot-put technique and self-efficacy were measured in a pre- (week 1), post- (week 8) and retention (week 9) test. During practice (weeks 2–7, including four practice sessions), students rated their self-efficacy. After the last practice session, students rated their perceptions towards practice (i.e. perceived enjoyment and perceived learning effect). Hierarchical two-stepped linear regression analyses were performed to explore whether the type of intervention (SC-VF, EC-VF or TG group) and self-efficacy during practice predicted motor learning. Findings: Results showed that shot-put distance and technique increased significantly after practice, without differences between groups. Self-efficacy improved significantly after practice for the SC-VF (from pre- to retention test) and the TG groups (from pre- to post- and retention test), but not for the EC-VF group. Furthermore, students in the SC-VF group reported a higher perceived learning effect, compared to students in the EC-VF group. No differences in perceived enjoyment were found. Finally, self-efficacy during practice predicted improvements in shot-put technique from pre- to retention test. Conclusion: Self-controlled video feedback without guidance of a teacher on movement technique led to similar learning effects as traditional guidance of the teacher in a PE context. Self-control of feedback delivery (i.e. timing and frequency) seemed to have positive effects on self-efficacy and perceived learning effect, but did not lead to superior motor learning or perceived enjoyment. This study indicates that self-controlled video feedback as applied in this study can be implemented in PE. Future research that investigates whether and how the application of self-controlled video feedback can be further optimized, also for different types of skills, is needed. Furthermore, monitoring the application of self-regulatory skills seems important for further understanding the effects of self-controlled video feedback.",
keywords = "motor learning, Physical Education, self-controlled video feedback, self-efficacy, self-regulation",
author = "Marjan Kok and Annet Komen and {van Capelleveen}, Laurien and {van der Kamp}, John",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "49--66",
journal = "Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy",
issn = "1740-8989",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting : an exploratory study on the shot-put. / Kok, Marjan; Komen, Annet; van Capelleveen, Laurien; van der Kamp, John.

In: Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, Vol. 25, No. 1, 02.01.2020, p. 49-66.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of self-controlled video feedback on motor learning and self-efficacy in a Physical Education setting

T2 - an exploratory study on the shot-put

AU - Kok, Marjan

AU - Komen, Annet

AU - van Capelleveen, Laurien

AU - van der Kamp, John

PY - 2020/1/2

Y1 - 2020/1/2

N2 - Background: Laboratory studies have shown that self-controlled (video) feedback benefits motor learning and self-motivational beliefs. These outcomes are relevant to Physical Education (PE), but need to be verified for PE settings, in which practice and feedback need to be organized in large groups rather than individually as is common in laboratory studies. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to examine the effects of self-controlled video feedback on students' motor learning and self-efficacy in a PE setting when students obtain feedback relatively independent of the teacher. The secondary aim was to examine to what extent self-control and self-efficacy during practice predicted students' motor learning. Method: Participants were 56 grade 1 students of a regular secondary school who practised the shot-put during four practice sessions organized during PE lessons. One class practised with self-controlled video feedback (SC-VF group, n = 22). They practised relatively independent of the teacher: peers filmed each other and analysed the recorded video with help from video applications, a video model and cue cards. A second class practised in a similar fashion. However, they were yoked to the first group and could not choose the timing and frequency of feedback delivery (externally controlled video feedback, EC-VF group, n = 17). A third group practised in a traditional way (teacher guided TG group, n = 17) with demonstrations, verbal instructions and feedback from a PE teacher. Shot-put distance, shot-put technique and self-efficacy were measured in a pre- (week 1), post- (week 8) and retention (week 9) test. During practice (weeks 2–7, including four practice sessions), students rated their self-efficacy. After the last practice session, students rated their perceptions towards practice (i.e. perceived enjoyment and perceived learning effect). Hierarchical two-stepped linear regression analyses were performed to explore whether the type of intervention (SC-VF, EC-VF or TG group) and self-efficacy during practice predicted motor learning. Findings: Results showed that shot-put distance and technique increased significantly after practice, without differences between groups. Self-efficacy improved significantly after practice for the SC-VF (from pre- to retention test) and the TG groups (from pre- to post- and retention test), but not for the EC-VF group. Furthermore, students in the SC-VF group reported a higher perceived learning effect, compared to students in the EC-VF group. No differences in perceived enjoyment were found. Finally, self-efficacy during practice predicted improvements in shot-put technique from pre- to retention test. Conclusion: Self-controlled video feedback without guidance of a teacher on movement technique led to similar learning effects as traditional guidance of the teacher in a PE context. Self-control of feedback delivery (i.e. timing and frequency) seemed to have positive effects on self-efficacy and perceived learning effect, but did not lead to superior motor learning or perceived enjoyment. This study indicates that self-controlled video feedback as applied in this study can be implemented in PE. Future research that investigates whether and how the application of self-controlled video feedback can be further optimized, also for different types of skills, is needed. Furthermore, monitoring the application of self-regulatory skills seems important for further understanding the effects of self-controlled video feedback.

AB - Background: Laboratory studies have shown that self-controlled (video) feedback benefits motor learning and self-motivational beliefs. These outcomes are relevant to Physical Education (PE), but need to be verified for PE settings, in which practice and feedback need to be organized in large groups rather than individually as is common in laboratory studies. Purpose: The main aim of this study was to examine the effects of self-controlled video feedback on students' motor learning and self-efficacy in a PE setting when students obtain feedback relatively independent of the teacher. The secondary aim was to examine to what extent self-control and self-efficacy during practice predicted students' motor learning. Method: Participants were 56 grade 1 students of a regular secondary school who practised the shot-put during four practice sessions organized during PE lessons. One class practised with self-controlled video feedback (SC-VF group, n = 22). They practised relatively independent of the teacher: peers filmed each other and analysed the recorded video with help from video applications, a video model and cue cards. A second class practised in a similar fashion. However, they were yoked to the first group and could not choose the timing and frequency of feedback delivery (externally controlled video feedback, EC-VF group, n = 17). A third group practised in a traditional way (teacher guided TG group, n = 17) with demonstrations, verbal instructions and feedback from a PE teacher. Shot-put distance, shot-put technique and self-efficacy were measured in a pre- (week 1), post- (week 8) and retention (week 9) test. During practice (weeks 2–7, including four practice sessions), students rated their self-efficacy. After the last practice session, students rated their perceptions towards practice (i.e. perceived enjoyment and perceived learning effect). Hierarchical two-stepped linear regression analyses were performed to explore whether the type of intervention (SC-VF, EC-VF or TG group) and self-efficacy during practice predicted motor learning. Findings: Results showed that shot-put distance and technique increased significantly after practice, without differences between groups. Self-efficacy improved significantly after practice for the SC-VF (from pre- to retention test) and the TG groups (from pre- to post- and retention test), but not for the EC-VF group. Furthermore, students in the SC-VF group reported a higher perceived learning effect, compared to students in the EC-VF group. No differences in perceived enjoyment were found. Finally, self-efficacy during practice predicted improvements in shot-put technique from pre- to retention test. Conclusion: Self-controlled video feedback without guidance of a teacher on movement technique led to similar learning effects as traditional guidance of the teacher in a PE context. Self-control of feedback delivery (i.e. timing and frequency) seemed to have positive effects on self-efficacy and perceived learning effect, but did not lead to superior motor learning or perceived enjoyment. This study indicates that self-controlled video feedback as applied in this study can be implemented in PE. Future research that investigates whether and how the application of self-controlled video feedback can be further optimized, also for different types of skills, is needed. Furthermore, monitoring the application of self-regulatory skills seems important for further understanding the effects of self-controlled video feedback.

KW - motor learning

KW - Physical Education

KW - self-controlled video feedback

KW - self-efficacy

KW - self-regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075062673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075062673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773

DO - 10.1080/17408989.2019.1688773

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 49

EP - 66

JO - Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy

JF - Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy

SN - 1740-8989

IS - 1

ER -