The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness

Sarah D’Amour*, Jelte E. Bos, Behrang Keshavarz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) is a well-known sensation in virtual environments and simulators, typically characterized by a variety of symptoms such as pallor, sweating, dizziness, fatigue, and/or nausea. Numerous methods to reduce VIMS have been previously introduced; however, a reliable countermeasure is still missing. In the present study, the effect of airflow and seat vibration to alleviate VIMS was investigated. Eighty-two participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups (airflow, vibration, combined airflow and vibration, and control) and then exposed to a 15 min long video of a bicycle ride shot from first-person view. VIMS was measured using the Fast Motion Sickness Scale (FMS) and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Results showed that the exposure of airflow significantly reduced VIMS, whereas the presence of seat vibration, in contrast, did not have an impact on VIMS. Additionally, we found that females reported higher FMS scores than males, however, this sex difference was not found in the SSQ scores. Our findings demonstrate that airflow can be an effective and easy-to-apply technique to reduce VIMS in virtual environments and simulators, while vibration applied to the seat is not a successful method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2811-2820
Number of pages10
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume235
Issue number9
Early online date20 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2017

Keywords

  • Airflow
  • Gender
  • Motion sickness
  • Simulator sickness
  • Vection
  • Vibration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this