The Eligibility Guidelines examined: The use of country of origin information by UNHCR

Femke Vogelaar

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on the use of Country of Origin Information (COI) by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the Eligibility Guidelines, which assess the protection needs of specific groups of asylum seekers. The article assesses the standards set by UNHCR regarding the use of COI and whether, and how, UNHCR applies these standards in the Guidelines. The analysis is based on a study of the Eligibility Guidelines assessing the protection needs of asylum seekers from Afghanistan, Somalia, and Sri Lanka. Analysis of these Guidelines shows that UNHCR does not adhere to its own standards for the cross-checking of information and that this process lacks transparency. UNHCR statements are not consistently based on a variety of sources, and it appears that UNHCR does not consistently verify the COI it relies on. UNHCR's assessment of the reliability of sources, and the way it balances supporting and contradictory information, also lacks transparency. Moreover, the extent to which UNHCR field offices contribute to the Guidelines is not clear. Due to this lack of transparency, the reliability of UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines cannot always be presumed to be beyond doubt. As a result, each set of Guidelines should be assessed on its own merits and accorded appropriate weight in the process of balancing all available evidence during the assessment of a need for international protection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)617-640
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Refugee law
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

UNHCR
country of origin
refugee
United Nations
transparency
asylum seeker
lack
Somalia
Sri Lanka
Afghanistan

Bibliographical note

Volume 29, Issue 4, publication date 30 December 2017

Cite this

@article{800302a93a744b75af0923b731b3ab9d,
title = "The Eligibility Guidelines examined: The use of country of origin information by UNHCR",
abstract = "This article focuses on the use of Country of Origin Information (COI) by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the Eligibility Guidelines, which assess the protection needs of specific groups of asylum seekers. The article assesses the standards set by UNHCR regarding the use of COI and whether, and how, UNHCR applies these standards in the Guidelines. The analysis is based on a study of the Eligibility Guidelines assessing the protection needs of asylum seekers from Afghanistan, Somalia, and Sri Lanka. Analysis of these Guidelines shows that UNHCR does not adhere to its own standards for the cross-checking of information and that this process lacks transparency. UNHCR statements are not consistently based on a variety of sources, and it appears that UNHCR does not consistently verify the COI it relies on. UNHCR's assessment of the reliability of sources, and the way it balances supporting and contradictory information, also lacks transparency. Moreover, the extent to which UNHCR field offices contribute to the Guidelines is not clear. Due to this lack of transparency, the reliability of UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines cannot always be presumed to be beyond doubt. As a result, each set of Guidelines should be assessed on its own merits and accorded appropriate weight in the process of balancing all available evidence during the assessment of a need for international protection.",
author = "Femke Vogelaar",
note = "Volume 29, Issue 4, publication date 30 December 2017",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1093/ijrl/eey003",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "617--640",
journal = "International Journal of Refugee law",
issn = "0953-8186",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

The Eligibility Guidelines examined : The use of country of origin information by UNHCR. / Vogelaar, Femke.

In: International Journal of Refugee law, Vol. 29, No. 4, 22.02.2018, p. 617-640.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Eligibility Guidelines examined

T2 - The use of country of origin information by UNHCR

AU - Vogelaar, Femke

N1 - Volume 29, Issue 4, publication date 30 December 2017

PY - 2018/2/22

Y1 - 2018/2/22

N2 - This article focuses on the use of Country of Origin Information (COI) by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the Eligibility Guidelines, which assess the protection needs of specific groups of asylum seekers. The article assesses the standards set by UNHCR regarding the use of COI and whether, and how, UNHCR applies these standards in the Guidelines. The analysis is based on a study of the Eligibility Guidelines assessing the protection needs of asylum seekers from Afghanistan, Somalia, and Sri Lanka. Analysis of these Guidelines shows that UNHCR does not adhere to its own standards for the cross-checking of information and that this process lacks transparency. UNHCR statements are not consistently based on a variety of sources, and it appears that UNHCR does not consistently verify the COI it relies on. UNHCR's assessment of the reliability of sources, and the way it balances supporting and contradictory information, also lacks transparency. Moreover, the extent to which UNHCR field offices contribute to the Guidelines is not clear. Due to this lack of transparency, the reliability of UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines cannot always be presumed to be beyond doubt. As a result, each set of Guidelines should be assessed on its own merits and accorded appropriate weight in the process of balancing all available evidence during the assessment of a need for international protection.

AB - This article focuses on the use of Country of Origin Information (COI) by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the Eligibility Guidelines, which assess the protection needs of specific groups of asylum seekers. The article assesses the standards set by UNHCR regarding the use of COI and whether, and how, UNHCR applies these standards in the Guidelines. The analysis is based on a study of the Eligibility Guidelines assessing the protection needs of asylum seekers from Afghanistan, Somalia, and Sri Lanka. Analysis of these Guidelines shows that UNHCR does not adhere to its own standards for the cross-checking of information and that this process lacks transparency. UNHCR statements are not consistently based on a variety of sources, and it appears that UNHCR does not consistently verify the COI it relies on. UNHCR's assessment of the reliability of sources, and the way it balances supporting and contradictory information, also lacks transparency. Moreover, the extent to which UNHCR field offices contribute to the Guidelines is not clear. Due to this lack of transparency, the reliability of UNHCR Eligibility Guidelines cannot always be presumed to be beyond doubt. As a result, each set of Guidelines should be assessed on its own merits and accorded appropriate weight in the process of balancing all available evidence during the assessment of a need for international protection.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045435772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045435772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijrl/eey003

DO - 10.1093/ijrl/eey003

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 617

EP - 640

JO - International Journal of Refugee law

JF - International Journal of Refugee law

SN - 0953-8186

IS - 4

ER -