The Emperor’s New Clothing: National Responses to “Undesirable and Unreturnable” Aliens under Asylum and Immigration Law

David James Cantor, J. van Wijk, Sarah Singer, M.P. Bolhuis

Research output: Contribution to JournalSpecial issue (editing)Academicpeer-review

Abstract

The “scandal” of foreign criminals whom our governments cannot send back to their own countries has become something of a tabloid obsession. Yet, while suspected or convicted of serious crimes or considered to pose a danger to society, such “undesirable and unreturnable” aliens equally often languish in an ambiguous and even dangerous state of protracted legal “limbo”, lacking a defined immigration status and attendant access to basic rights in the host State. In the absence of an agreed common framework for resolving this anomalous situation, how do individual States deal with the legal and policy paradox that is embodied by these purportedly “undesirable”, but also ultimately non-removable, aliens?
This Special Issue offers a preliminary perspective on this contemporary concern
by presenting eight specially commissioned pieces of new research. Each of the contributions examines a different national context where this issue has arisen in recent years, resulting in eight detailed country case studies covering Australia, Canada, France, Greece, India, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The aim is to produce a comparative understanding of national responses in this relatively diverse range of countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalRefugee Survey Quarterly
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

immigration law
crime
clothing
immigration
scandal
Greece
Turkey
Netherlands
offense
France
Canada
India
rights
society
policy
Society

Keywords

  • aliens
  • undesirable
  • unreturnable
  • criminality
  • national security

Cite this

@article{72b1f3660fa44b33962d70df52483cbe,
title = "The Emperor’s New Clothing: National Responses to “Undesirable and Unreturnable” Aliens under Asylum and Immigration Law",
abstract = "The “scandal” of foreign criminals whom our governments cannot send back to their own countries has become something of a tabloid obsession. Yet, while suspected or convicted of serious crimes or considered to pose a danger to society, such “undesirable and unreturnable” aliens equally often languish in an ambiguous and even dangerous state of protracted legal “limbo”, lacking a defined immigration status and attendant access to basic rights in the host State. In the absence of an agreed common framework for resolving this anomalous situation, how do individual States deal with the legal and policy paradox that is embodied by these purportedly “undesirable”, but also ultimately non-removable, aliens? This Special Issue offers a preliminary perspective on this contemporary concernby presenting eight specially commissioned pieces of new research. Each of the contributions examines a different national context where this issue has arisen in recent years, resulting in eight detailed country case studies covering Australia, Canada, France, Greece, India, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The aim is to produce a comparative understanding of national responses in this relatively diverse range of countries.",
keywords = "aliens, undesirable, unreturnable, criminality, national security",
author = "Cantor, {David James} and {van Wijk}, J. and Sarah Singer and M.P. Bolhuis",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1093/rsq/hdw023",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Refugee Survey Quarterly",
issn = "1020-4067",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

The Emperor’s New Clothing: National Responses to “Undesirable and Unreturnable” Aliens under Asylum and Immigration Law. / Cantor, David James; van Wijk, J.; Singer, Sarah; Bolhuis, M.P.

In: Refugee Survey Quarterly, Vol. 36, 11.01.2017, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to JournalSpecial issue (editing)Academicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Emperor’s New Clothing: National Responses to “Undesirable and Unreturnable” Aliens under Asylum and Immigration Law

AU - Cantor, David James

AU - van Wijk, J.

AU - Singer, Sarah

AU - Bolhuis, M.P.

PY - 2017/1/11

Y1 - 2017/1/11

N2 - The “scandal” of foreign criminals whom our governments cannot send back to their own countries has become something of a tabloid obsession. Yet, while suspected or convicted of serious crimes or considered to pose a danger to society, such “undesirable and unreturnable” aliens equally often languish in an ambiguous and even dangerous state of protracted legal “limbo”, lacking a defined immigration status and attendant access to basic rights in the host State. In the absence of an agreed common framework for resolving this anomalous situation, how do individual States deal with the legal and policy paradox that is embodied by these purportedly “undesirable”, but also ultimately non-removable, aliens? This Special Issue offers a preliminary perspective on this contemporary concernby presenting eight specially commissioned pieces of new research. Each of the contributions examines a different national context where this issue has arisen in recent years, resulting in eight detailed country case studies covering Australia, Canada, France, Greece, India, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The aim is to produce a comparative understanding of national responses in this relatively diverse range of countries.

AB - The “scandal” of foreign criminals whom our governments cannot send back to their own countries has become something of a tabloid obsession. Yet, while suspected or convicted of serious crimes or considered to pose a danger to society, such “undesirable and unreturnable” aliens equally often languish in an ambiguous and even dangerous state of protracted legal “limbo”, lacking a defined immigration status and attendant access to basic rights in the host State. In the absence of an agreed common framework for resolving this anomalous situation, how do individual States deal with the legal and policy paradox that is embodied by these purportedly “undesirable”, but also ultimately non-removable, aliens? This Special Issue offers a preliminary perspective on this contemporary concernby presenting eight specially commissioned pieces of new research. Each of the contributions examines a different national context where this issue has arisen in recent years, resulting in eight detailed country case studies covering Australia, Canada, France, Greece, India, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. The aim is to produce a comparative understanding of national responses in this relatively diverse range of countries.

KW - aliens

KW - undesirable

KW - unreturnable

KW - criminality

KW - national security

U2 - 10.1093/rsq/hdw023

DO - 10.1093/rsq/hdw023

M3 - Special issue (editing)

VL - 36

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Refugee Survey Quarterly

JF - Refugee Survey Quarterly

SN - 1020-4067

ER -